No warning shot, ever.
If I were OCing & someone attacked, he's made his decision.
No hesitation to shoot if I felt endangered.
(I'd still try to back away & tell him "NO!", or "STOP!")
cc, however, I
might hesitate slightly to let the BG realize he's just made a
very bad error, & possibly decide to either run away or fall down & wait for cops to come rescue him from "dat crazy b|+ch wit da gun" before I have to
make him fall down.
The pistol would be in hand, pointed at his chest, while he made his choice.
If he kept coming at me, he'd fall down.
And I might not hesitate. If it's happening at close range, there's no time to give him a second chance.
If he weren't attacking me, he wouldn't get hurt.
Jay Gatz said:
Most states will consider a "warning shot" a negligent or dangerous discharge and charge you for it regardless of the damage done/justification.
...If you're in fear for your life shoot center of mass until they stop, you stand the best chance of survival and the lowest chance of prosecution.
+1 on both
Shotgun said:
There could be circumstances when having your gun in your hand is a good idea while you're assessing the situation.
At home, waiting & hoping the BG doesn't come up the stairs.
Facing down a group, while there's still distance/time.
But at SD distances? No time.
Outdoorsman1 said:
if there was time I would make sure a VERY LOUD warning shouted vocally (borderline scream) would be cause for pause for the BG.
Also attract attention, so people might see what's happening.
"STOP! DON'T HURT ME! STAY AWAY!"
SovereignAxe said:
I guess I should have pointed out that, while you could quickly surmise the safety of the background to your target (the baddie)
Part of the reason citizens have a better hit rate than LEO is because our encounters happen @ closer range.
If he's at arm's length (to start), it's hard to miss.