Yes I have add
Originally yes my opinion is cc is easier than oc and the why is because of public reaction not just to handguns but (I know off topic) long guns as well (as I only own shotguns). Public reaction is how most policy decisions are reached. Normalizing the oc practice has to a educational one for the public people have to be eased into it gently. Once the general public has accepted it then more and more oc can occur. The question is how do you go about educating the public (TV commercials, TV specials, web, email, facebook, public officials species, press releases, news coverage). Just telling the general public hey I can do this deal with it isn't a very effective tool. How do we find the educational process do we go grass roots or get the nra, and all gun and ammo manufacturers to donate into the pot. It is amazing what people will agree to and accept as normal if they are eased into it and charmed into it (see Bill Clinton).
You continue to ask how to educate the public and I will once again point you to post #4.... your answer was given to you right at the beginning of this discussion. Others have also given the same answer and the fact that you ignore it leads me to believe that what you want is what YOU consider to be an acceptable way to educate the public.
You mentioned you have shotguns... well.... about educating the public.........
A very important case started because one young man openly carried a shotgun into a Lansing Mi. library. That started a manure storm and other open carriers from Michigan Open Carry (carrying holstered pistols) got involved so the library, being what is called a legal "authority", decided it could make a no guns rule and because the police refused to arrest people for engaging in the legal activity of open carrying the library itself could require it's no guns rule be enforced so the library petitioned the circuit court for an injunction against open carry.... and got it.
But then came the appeal to that circuit court decision and the appeals court said that the Michigan legislature occupies the entire field of gun law and that an "authority" (like a library authority, a transit authority, a downtown development authority) does NOT have the power to make rules more strict than existing State law.
Well... the library took that to Michigan's Supreme Court and the Supreme Court refused to hear the case effectively upholding the Appeals Court decision.
But what does the outcome mean?
It means State law trumps any gun rules made by "authorities" throughout the entire State. And here is the kicker...
The media, thinking it had a fantastically emotionally sensational story to run with, ended up educating the entire State that open carry, even of a long gun, was legal............. all because one young man had the stones to do exactly what you are afraid of... to do exactly what you don't like to see. And that was to be ... in your face.. about the right to bear arms.
How does the public get educated about the right to bear arms? By people actually bearing arms. Not by hiding the gun with concealed carry and writing letters to politicians that are used for toilet paper.... but by getting off our arses and actually legally carrying our sidearms right there in your face.
Oh yes... and then there is the link to information about the CADL case:
http://www.michiganopencarry.org/cadl