The Don
Guest
Personal attack. Good job!!!!?
Step 5 of the Spartacus Maneuver...check.
Personal attack. Good job!!!!?
Personal attack. Good job!!!!
You are including yourself, right?
He always resorts to Personal attacks when he is obviously wrong. It is a WAVE tactic.
It is a shall issue state. It shall be issued unless you are deemed to not be eligible.
There is nothing that needs to be changed. There is nothing in state law that allows them to use your statement as grounds to reject or approve your application.
CT is shall issue.
If Connecticut was shall issue , I would not have spent 2 years without my permit cause some cop didn't like my attitude, and have to go before the board of firearms permits examiners and beg for it back .... Connecticut is may issue , always has been,
It is shall issue unless they don't want to give it to you or feel like taking it away and making you go before a board that does not ever meet, last I knew..... Last I knew they could (and were) still pulling permits for anything they felt like doing it for. Got a link for your new shall issue law?
There is nothing in the laws that disbars it either.....
Personal attack. Good job!!!!
You report the horrible personal attack which was simply an observation and then you quote it so everyone can read it?
Good job!!!!
I reported it, not Paul (to my knowledge).
Its funny I've thought the same thing. Like maybe a little "more" time and we would have more time to get people who want to carry out there carrying now.
I believe it really does all start with getting people exercising their right to carry.
When you don't have something, when you are hungry, you'll eat anything.
When you aren't starving, you want something GOOD to eat.
TOO many Wisconsinites are STARVED for the right to carry. As such, they are too likely to grasp at any opportunity to carry the state affords them and call it success.
Too many people would say "permit fee?, ok fine, government mandated training?, ok fine, anything so I can carry"
Too many would be happy to accept expensive mandatory training, fingerprinting, expensive permit fee's (taxes) that have to be renewed every few years because its SOMETHING more than they have now and now they are starved for the right to carry.
When we get people out OC'ing, they are exercising a right, not starving for one. As such, though they still REALLY want CC, they aren't as desperate for it as they were when they thought they couldn't carry at all. They've had a taste of true freedom and they will want more of the same. Then the scenario is "I've been carrying for years, NOW you want me to pay a tax and go through government mandated training to do something I've already been doing?
I think back 5 years ago when I got my Florida non-resident CC permit. I was HAPPY to go through the hassle of going and getting fingerprinted. I was happy to pay the fee to Florida for my CC permit. NOW this year I get my renewal notice and I have a bitter taste in my mouth having to go get fingerprinted AGAIN and pay $50 to Florida just to renew my permit.
I think with the recent explosion of awareness, thousands more people who sat in the "starving for the right to carry" category are beginning to OC. I do still think repeal of 941.23 is entirely possible especially with the turnover in Madison with the anti-incumbent sentiment. The national wave of "less government all around" will play to our favor here in Wisconsin as well. So I am entirely convinced repeal of 941.23 is possible, but it has crossed my mind that another summer getting people out and OC'ing before this comes up in the legislature would really fortify our position.
You report the horrible personal attack which was simply an observation and then you quote it so everyone can read it?
Good job!!!!
+1!I reported it, not Paul (to my knowledge).
I hope you never come to my house.Don't make me come over to your house with more bat poop!
I hope you never come to my house.
I have to ask you to not.I come to everyone's house eventually...
I come to everyone's house eventually...
Don't make me come over to your house with more bat poop!
If Wisconsin already has constitutional OC and blood hasn't flooded the streets how will implementing a CC permit system going to make one safer or not? If you can already be trusted to OC without a permit why then can't you be trusted to CC?
IMHO I would make it law that if a person is CC that he/she declare his/her firearm to a Police Officer upon detainment, but other wise a person should carry however he/she feels.
If Wisconsin already has constitutional OC and blood hasn't flooded the streets how will implementing a CC permit system going to make one safer or not? If you can already be trusted to OC without a permit why then can't you be trusted to CC?