I have never, ever misquoted Beretta, and she knows that. She is a vile, reprehensible proponent for socialism and communism. Notice in previous posts, she dare not deny this fact.
In order to point out to those who clearly think her 1500 posts have been worth something, let me drop some of the gems from her own keyboard:
Here we go again with the concept of "liberty" and "true freedom," what ever that might be. Our founding fathers were at the least culpable in the government that we have, hell, they wrote the Constitution with all of its interpretive Articles. The founding fathers, if they were as intelligent in crafting the Constitution as you think that they were, might not have been so intelligent...or intended for us to be where we are at. I am happy to read that you have acknowledged that "liberty" and "true freedom" are concepts.
Beretta, believes in gun control as being acceptable, because she believes the direct interpretation of the Second Amendment, is open to "liberal interpretation".
Just ask her. See if she has the guts to be directly honest with you.
This is in response to Sudden Valley Gunners statement that we need to stop creating erroneous law, and just live free.
As free as that might sound, most people couldn't handle that type of freedom, and most people need to be constrained, unfortunately. With unfettered freedom comes a much more dangerous world. We can pontificate all day about how laws only obstruct law abiding citizens from exercising "rights."
If the majority of people are down with unfettered freedom, I am willing to accept it...just make sure you are prepared. Humans are not inherently good-willed; most need to be forced to keep their butt on the straight and narrow.
If you don't believe me just look around the world at States that are basically lawless. You will find your unfettered freedom that you are so eager to embrace.
What is my point? I stated this above, and have stated it before: Most people have to be told how to think and what to do. Which explains the religious tendency of humans, and the fact that most States have some form of government that controls its people by either indirect or direct force...the barrel of a gun. Unfettered freedom would only lead to a consolidation of the power so many people wish was not present within societies. This nostalgic concept of freedom, as if generations before us were any more or less free than we are now, is a political exercise, nothing more. We are still subject to the same social structure as our forefathers. Freedom is merely a concept.
"Complete freedom" with government acting on behalf of free people. I suppose it is one of those nostalgic American "ideals" that both are possible?
"Religious People", as Beretta puts it, are a "huge problem" in reference to her socialist model:
Personal responsibility is a facade created by religious people in particular who seek to negate their individual contribution to collective social issues that have a negative impact on certain classes, races, etc. of people.
This is the exact quote in her next post.
Religion uses is as a tool, they did not create it.
Studying the framers is dumb ok? Durp.
How brave of you to assert that we should dig up the writing of the long-deceased and pontificate what each and every one of them intended, and attempt to bring all of their stances together as if we can form some specific purpose in the Constitution.
The examples of her socialist intent on this forum are pretty clear to be honest.
Her 1500 posts are a reflection of more and more of this same crap.
Enjoy.
. You see, even this 'bagpipe' has something rational to say from time to time. Of course, he obvious chose his words, and tone wisely so that it could be read(e) as it is - as Limbaugh meant it to be read(e). Thank you Limbaugh.
