shame you have me on ignore...
snippp'n between us not withstanding, "S" what credibility, prestige, and high regard i personally held towards you regarding your commitment to KY's advocacy activities has fallen to zero for publicly dragging another individual through the mud just to satisfy bolstering your EGO!
the audacity to believe you needed to publicly post your responce to someone's PM is egregious and truly beyond comprehension!
(6) NO PERSONAL ATTACKS: While you may disagree strongly with another poster based upon their opinion, we will NOT tolerate any personal attacks...snipp'
NOTE THAT THIS RULE APPLIES TO PMs AS WELL AS FORUM POSTS!!!
(18) PRIVATE MESSAGES: The content of private messages are NOT completely private in that they may be reported to the administrator should the private messaging function be used to harass or spam another user. However, the content of private messages should not be posted publicly on the forum in an attempt to embarrass or discredit another member.
further you have flagrantly seen fit to also violate the rules of this august membership which is truly unconscionable for a gentleman of your stature and standing, you truly should be ashamed for these acts.
snippp'n between us not withstanding, "S" what credibility, prestige, and high regard i personally held towards you regarding your commitment to KY's advocacy activities has fallen to zero for publicly dragging another individual through the mud just to satisfy bolstering your EGO!
the audacity to believe you needed to publicly post your responce to someone's PM is egregious and truly beyond comprehension!
(6) NO PERSONAL ATTACKS: While you may disagree strongly with another poster based upon their opinion, we will NOT tolerate any personal attacks...snipp'
NOTE THAT THIS RULE APPLIES TO PMs AS WELL AS FORUM POSTS!!!
(18) PRIVATE MESSAGES: The content of private messages are NOT completely private in that they may be reported to the administrator should the private messaging function be used to harass or spam another user. However, the content of private messages should not be posted publicly on the forum in an attempt to embarrass or discredit another member.
further you have flagrantly seen fit to also violate the rules of this august membership which is truly unconscionable for a gentleman of your stature and standing, you truly should be ashamed for these acts.
My response to PM from Ghost1958.
I am well acquainted with Rep. Goforth's request for an opinion from the AG's office. You see, he publicly asked Ky. gun owners that cared about their rights to meet him in the Rotunda of the Capitol and go with him to hand carry the request down the hall to the AG's office. Only a few of us bothered to show up. I don't remember seeing you there. You have terribly misrepresented the body of that request.
****************************************************************
This information I did not include in my PM.
I have in my hands at this moment my copy of Rep. Goforth's request for opinion of the AG. It bears little resemblance to what Mr. Ghost has presented it to be. I don't know if he is unable to understand what he was told or unable to read what is before him. It will not be long before the request is made public. Andy Beshear ignored this request until he could vacate the AG's office. I have been told that he left over 50 unanswered requests for opinion. Some of them were over six months old. David Cameron is having to work through them.
In any case, once the opinion is made public, it will be plain for all to see that Ghost1958 has bent everything in this request to suit his own narrative. It says nothing about the unconstitutionality of the CCDW program or the ability of the General Assembly to ban, not ban or regulate concealed weapons. The request prefaces the real question with a little less than two pages of quotes. Some from the Ky. constitution and even from the Federal Gun Free School Zone Act. It mentions the prohibition on open carry on college campuses and on school property, BY A PERSON WITH A KY. CCDW. It ONLY asks one question, which I hereby paraphrase, would it be constitutional to arrest or otherwise impede a person who possesses a Ky. CCDW for open carrying a firearm in any location within the Commonwealth of Ky. except private property or federally prohibited property?
Now you see, Rep. Goforth does not ask if the concealed carry law is unconstitutional, he doesn't say that he wants to challenge it or even imply that is his motive. He even uses the necessity of having a Ky. CCDW as a condition of his question, because he knows it is required near school property. I am expecting that, when this request becomes public, Ghost1958 will claim that he has been lied to or that he misunderstood. It has been my experience from dealing with both men, Representative Goforth is the much more honorable and truthful of the two. Since I have a copy of the request, I can tell you that it does not do what Ghost1958 says it does. Just to refresh your memory, here is what he wrote:
You might want to check with your buddy.
" Theres a plan here". The bill is designed to be challenged in court and defeated .
That however is the long way around the barn to get rid of the ccdw scam .
The bill cannot stand a court challenge, which then beings up the issue, which apparently a AG opinion was requested about the unconstitutionality of the General assembly creating a ccdw in the first place which it has no ky constitutional power to do.
Only to ban or not ban CC. Period full stop.
At that point ccdw would be declared unconstitutional. At least that is the apparent thinking.
However it's much simpler to simply repeal all CCDW regulations, create a cc card with no requirements to get for out of state travel and be done with it.
Complete BS on top of lies on top of ignorance.