To be honest I believe this thread will be locked since advocating illegal activity, even when unconstitutional, is against the rules.
Yesterday OCDO was against 594. Today OCDO supports it implicitly and punishes those who wish to rebel with reprimand.
I believe this fundamental flaw has been pointed out before by others, but now it is apparent.
Yesterday OCDO was against 594. Today OCDO supports it implicitly and punishes those who wish to rebel with reprimand.
I believe this fundamental flaw has been pointed out before by others, but now it is apparent.