• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Has anyone disarmed you?

If you routinely open carry, has anyone disarmed or attempted to disarm you?


  • Total voters
    3

reconvic

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2009
Messages
174
Location
Mesa Az., , USA
imported post

I have had a few encounters where they tried but they are no longer here.
I carry locked and loaded and have been Holster certified to shoot from the holster with papers to prove it at some ranges after a test. The key is Practice, and always wear your holster in the same spot and use the same one. It takes about 3000 times of practiceing before it become a reflex.
S/F Vic
 

SlackwareRobert

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2008
Messages
1,338
Location
Alabama, ,
imported post

reconvic wrote:
I have had a few encounters where they tried but they are no longer here.
I carry locked and loaded and have been Holster certified to shoot from the holster with papers to prove it at some ranges after a test. The key is Practice, and always wear your holster in the same spot and use the same one. It takes about 3000 times of practiceing before it become a reflex.
S/F Vic
Still hold the lonely distinction of having my two 'handgrenades' taken by full
body tackle in '79. Guess it is why I apposed waco so much, it hits close to home.
But they were concealed in bag, and I did get them back after the tackle.
But have never had all weapons taken yet. By next year will even be able
to stop the removal of OC'd one.
Did have one try to take the bullets one at a time though.:X

I have never heard of holster certification?
Guess I need to install photo shop and get me one.
Do you need one for each type of holster? I've never had a fast draw cut out
one, but was very impressed with the hundreths of a second draw and shoot from
them.

Would love to put a finger scanner on bottom edge of release, for id to unlock.
But that much security is to dangerous for failure at this time. I will try it on the car
doors and ignition for a couple of years so I have a failure test bed.
Hard use on my side, and minimal use on passenger side, all weather conditions.
Release on system failure is a piece of cake, it is the release on success that needs
the reliability.

Maybe on second BUG just to mess with the leo, "Just submit your finger prints
,passport photo, and check and I will add you to allowed release list in a few months,
after a background and of course you will have to show a need that justifies it.:lol:
 

ianto94

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
142
Location
, ,
imported post

Some of the things taught in a recent advanced handgun course I took, assuming non leo encounter.

1. if you are going to open carry, use a retention holster.
2. if a hand goes on your gun, your hand goes on that hand, twist away from their body and do your best to break the arm, or kick the living **** out of the attacker, or upon their release, draw down on the assailant while gaining distance.
3. pull a retention knife and slice the assailant's hand or arm to force release. Most people hate to be cut.
 

SlackwareRobert

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2008
Messages
1,338
Location
Alabama, ,
imported post

ianto94 wrote:
Some of the things taught in a recent advanced handgun course I took, assuming non leo encounter.

1. if you are going to open carry, use a retention holster.
2. if a hand goes on your gun, your hand goes on that hand, twist away from their body and do your best to break the arm, or kick the living **** out of the attacker, or upon their release, draw down on the assailant while gaining distance.
3. pull a retention knife and slice the assailant's hand or arm to force release. Most people hate to be cut.
I do not see why the instructor would qualify those 3 things for non-leo only.
If an unidentified individual is grabbing I fail to see the difference, a uniform does
not give anyone a right to break the law. And trying to steal my property shows
they are a criminal, so probably a fake cop as well.

But it is the #2 that gave me the idea for an active defensive holster, just need
to carry for a year with it's teeth pulled while I test it out. After a few thousand
draws without triggering it, i'll upgrade the teeth.
And I get to recycle some firing pins. Should make BHO and Al Gore happy.
 

Statesman

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
948
Location
Lexington, Kentucky, USA
imported post

50BMG wrote:
Hi all,

I'm new to this site and I am the guy who responded to Skip RE: this topic and caused this poll to happen in the first place... This poll is so highly unscientific for so many good reasons, the skewed results are literally laughable in reality...

You see, my summation about open carry being unnecessarily dangerous IS 100% valid... Legba's "non-funny joke" replyis a PERFECT example of what I intimated with my question to Skip... The guy who tookLegba's gun was drunk, and thank goodness the gun was unloaded... Now put yourself in a situation where the perp is not drunk (this even more coordinated), is an aggressive gang banger/drug dealer/punk type, and he is intent on taking your openly carried pistol away from you.... It CAN and WILL happen... You turn the corner in a mall/shopping center/grocery store/anywhere you feel "safe" and BAM, you can be disarmed and you are now his next victim with your own gun. Worst of all, through your arrogant actions of needlessly carrying in the open, that perp now has your gun to be used on who knows what other innocent bystanders... All of which could have been easily avoided if you were just carrying concealed...

Since open carry is not very widely executed by the average civilian, the only stats that I can draw upon (no pun intended) to substanciate my point would be to use the ones collected about armed law enforcement officers (LEOs) during their course of duty. According to info I found on the LEAA site; there are approximately 60,000 assaults on law enforcement annually. Also, recognize that every attack on an officer involves at least one gun in some way (the same as it would be in the civilian "open carry" perspective), except that LEOs in a dangerous situation usually have a partner or "backup". We civilians do not have this luxury usually (that's why we carry our guns in the first place, right?).

Important stat to remember: Depending on the year, as many as 10-20% of the officers killed in the line of duty are killed by bad guys who take the officer’s gun and use it against them. Interpolating that data to the above number of attacks on LEOs, that means 6,000 to 12,000 LEOs PER YEAR, DIE at the hands ofthe criminal who disarms them!

Another facor which officers are aware of when dealing with repeat offenders that we civilians usually don't train for is that bad guys routinely practice dis-arming techniques in while serving time in prison -- often while they are ‘bulking up’ with prison weight lifting equipment. An LEO that is aware and trained for this will STILL get their weapon stripped and die from that weapon in the percentages presented above. The odds of civilians who open carry, dying by the same aggressive confruntations HAVE TO BE EVEN HIGHER, given our lack of training/understanding of these very valid threats...

Now, I've heard lots of "tough guy" talk in this posting about learning other defensive measures so that youR gun doesn't get taken from you when you open carry, but all of that extra/necessary training is 99.9% USELESS if one just carries concealed!!! Use your training time to master proper shooting techniques, other valuable clearing drills, and quite frankly learning how to RUN FAST to avoid trouble!

Now, before the blugeoning starts on me, let me tell you that I "pack" EVERY DAY and have so since 2001. But no matter what my rights are, my state is "Shall Issue" so I ONLY carry concealed for all of the above reasons... I am not looking for trouble by open carrying, but if trouble finds me, I CAN neutralize it with my big SURPRISE the thug doesn't know about until he's 185 grains heavier (the weight of my bullet in his body)!. For those that aren't lucky enough to live in a shall issue state, but still have the right to open carry, then I say "OK, if you HAVE TO", but please realize that you make yourself a target of sorts, especially in a state which doesn't recognize "gun rights" very well because the local criminals ALSO feel the weight of being descriminated against on the "gun" issue, so your handgun is even MORE VALUABLE to them in those localities...

"I can carry openly, so I will", is not the best logic when considering how a deadly weapon can be carried... Look at the lady who recently was prosecuted in PA for open carry at her kids soccer game... She even had a CCW so what is the logic behind open carry that day? She was just asking for trouble, that's what. And, she's lucky that trouble came in the form of "legal trouble" via an LEO arresting her than some punk hiding behind her car with atire ironto smack her on the back of the head, take her gun, and possible kill her AND her kids! Yes, it IS that easy to happen, even to a 225lb 6' 1" tallguy like me! To think otherwise is very dangerous and equally short sighted....

Rant off now... What do you think?
My issue with concealed carry, is that in most states, it's a PRIVILEGE that can be revoked without due process, where open carry is a RIGHT. A license is permission from the King (the State), a right is not.

If you, and those who share your beliefs, and law enforcement agencies, would rather not see so much Open Carry, I would make the suggestion of adding concealed carry to the "rights" list, because many who OC are repulsed by the licensing aspect of CC. I despise nearly all forms of licensing by government, because when every significant activity in life requires "permission", it's a form of tyranny.

See this thread on "Unlicensing Concealed Carry in America" for my justifications on this belief. I have provided what I believe to be a solution to the problem in that thread.

http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/view_topic.php?id=15852&forum_id=65&highlight=unlicensing+
 

Ironbar

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
385
Location
Tigard, Oregon, USA
imported post

50BMG wrote:
Hi all,

I'm new to this site and I am the guy who responded to Skip RE: this topic and caused this poll to happen in the first place... This poll is so highly unscientific for so many good reasons, the skewed results are literally laughable in reality...

You see, my summation about open carry being unnecessarily dangerous IS 100% valid... Legba's "non-funny joke" replyis a PERFECT example of what I intimated with my question to Skip... The guy who tookLegba's gun was drunk, and thank goodness the gun was unloaded... Now put yourself in a situation where the perp is not drunk (this even more coordinated), is an aggressive gang banger/drug dealer/punk type, and he is intent on taking your openly carried pistol away from you.... It CAN and WILL happen... You turn the corner in a mall/shopping center/grocery store/anywhere you feel "safe" and BAM, you can be disarmed and you are now his next victim with your own gun. Worst of all, through your arrogant actions of needlessly carrying in the open, that perp now has your gun to be used on who knows what other innocent bystanders... All of which could have been easily avoided if you were just carrying concealed...

Since open carry is not very widely executed by the average civilian, the only stats that I can draw upon (no pun intended) to substanciate my point would be to use the ones collected about armed law enforcement officers (LEOs) during their course of duty. According to info I found on the LEAA site; there are approximately 60,000 assaults on law enforcement annually. Also, recognize that every attack on an officer involves at least one gun in some way (the same as it would be in the civilian "open carry" perspective), except that LEOs in a dangerous situation usually have a partner or "backup". We civilians do not have this luxury usually (that's why we carry our guns in the first place, right?).

Important stat to remember: Depending on the year, as many as 10-20% of the officers killed in the line of duty are killed by bad guys who take the officer’s gun and use it against them. Interpolating that data to the above number of attacks on LEOs, that means 6,000 to 12,000 LEOs PER YEAR, DIE at the hands ofthe criminal who disarms them!

Another facor which officers are aware of when dealing with repeat offenders that we civilians usually don't train for is that bad guys routinely practice dis-arming techniques in while serving time in prison -- often while they are ‘bulking up’ with prison weight lifting equipment. An LEO that is aware and trained for this will STILL get their weapon stripped and die from that weapon in the percentages presented above. The odds of civilians who open carry, dying by the same aggressive confruntations HAVE TO BE EVEN HIGHER, given our lack of training/understanding of these very valid threats...

Now, I've heard lots of "tough guy" talk in this posting about learning other defensive measures so that youR gun doesn't get taken from you when you open carry, but all of that extra/necessary training is 99.9% USELESS if one just carries concealed!!! Use your training time to master proper shooting techniques, other valuable clearing drills, and quite frankly learning how to RUN FAST to avoid trouble!

Now, before the blugeoning starts on me, let me tell you that I "pack" EVERY DAY and have so since 2001. But no matter what my rights are, my state is "Shall Issue" so I ONLY carry concealed for all of the above reasons... I am not looking for trouble by open carrying, but if trouble finds me, I CAN neutralize it with my big SURPRISE the thug doesn't know about until he's 185 grains heavier (the weight of my bullet in his body)!. For those that aren't lucky enough to live in a shall issue state, but still have the right to open carry, then I say "OK, if you HAVE TO", but please realize that you make yourself a target of sorts, especially in a state which doesn't recognize "gun rights" very well because the local criminals ALSO feel the weight of being descriminated against on the "gun" issue, so your handgun is even MORE VALUABLE to them in those localities...

"I can carry openly, so I will", is not the best logic when considering how a deadly weapon can be carried... Look at the lady who recently was prosecuted in PA for open carry at her kids soccer game... She even had a CCW so what is the logic behind open carry that day? She was just asking for trouble, that's what. And, she's lucky that trouble came in the form of "legal trouble" via an LEO arresting her than some punk hiding behind her car with atire ironto smack her on the back of the head, take her gun, and possible kill her AND her kids! Yes, it IS that easy to happen, even to a 225lb 6' 1" tallguy like me! To think otherwise is very dangerous and equally short sighted....

Rant off now... What do you think?

I think you're an idiot.

"6,000 to 12,000 LEOs PER YEAR, DIE "

The latest data I could find is for year 2008 where 132 LEO's lost their lives in the line of duty.

Your post ranks in the top ten stupidest things I've ever seen anyone post on any forum. Everything you stated is complete and total bullshit.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
imported post

Ironbar wrote:
50BMG wrote:
snipped....not worth repeating

I think you're an idiot.

"6,000 to 12,000 LEOs PER YEAR, DIE "

The latest data I could find is for year 2008 where 132 LEO's lost their lives in the line of duty.

Your post ranks in the top ten stupidest things I've ever seen anyone post on any forum. Everything you stated is complete and total bull@#$%.
Ironbar - you may be new to the forum but you have excellent perception.

If you don't feed 'em, he'll dry up and blow away.

Yata hey
 

jay75009

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
377
Location
somewhere, somewhere USA
imported post

i can honestly say if an LEO wanted to disarm me during a stop, odds are i would cooperate.

on the other hand if a passerby/friend/thug attempted a reach at my weapon in at any time place or situation without prior permission and aproval *plus clearing the weapon first!*..........i am pretty sure as my strong hand was gripping and removing thier hand from my weapon, my weak hand would be going for my backup and then to their temple!



as OC'ers we take 100% FULL responsiblity for our firearms!

in my OP my weapon in anyones hands other than my own is a un-safe firearm and i can bet that anyone on here will agree that any attempts from a civilian to dis-arm us would be met with more force then they were willing to meet.

thats just my OP :D
 

rmansu2

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2009
Messages
325
Location
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
imported post

You see, my summation about open carry being unnecessarily dangerous IS 100% valid... Legba's "non-funny joke" replyis a PERFECT example of what I intimated with my question to Skip... The guy who tookLegba's gun was drunk,
there are approximately 60,000 assaults on law enforcement annually. Also,
Important stat to remember: Depending on the year, as many as 10-20% of the officers killed in the line of duty are killed by bad guys who take the officer’s gun and use it against them. Interpolating that data to the above number of attacks on LEOs, that means 6,000 to 12,000 LEOs PER YEAR, DIE at the hands ofthe criminal who disarms them!
Statistically, 90% of statistics are made up! :D
(aren't they?:p)
 

jay75009

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
377
Location
somewhere, somewhere USA
imported post

rmansu2 wrote:
You see, my summation about open carry being unnecessarily dangerous IS 100% valid... Legba's "non-funny joke" replyis a PERFECT example of what I intimated with my question to Skip... The guy who tookLegba's gun was drunk,
there are approximately 60,000 assaults on law enforcement annually. Also,
Important stat to remember: Depending on the year, as many as 10-20% of the officers killed in the line of duty are killed by bad guys who take the officer’s gun and use it against them. Interpolating that data to the above number of attacks on LEOs, that means 6,000 to 12,000 LEOs PER YEAR, DIE at the hands ofthe criminal who disarms them!
Statistically, 90% of statistics are made up! :D
(aren't they?:p)
well statistics also prove that 75% of lw enforceAment officers are severely under-trained............and statistics also proove that over 1/2 of them are overweight and out of shape lol so using LEO statistics doesnt really prove much to me :p
 

GIdeon_70

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2007
Messages
121
Location
, ,
imported post

protector84 wrote:
When it comes to someone trying to disarm you, you should use standard self-defense techniques, the first of which includes basic common sense. First, here in Arizona, a law enforcement officer does have the right to temporarily disarm you during a detention or arrest. If you are stopped by a police officer either while driving, on foot, or otherwise, you are actually under arrest. That doesn't mean you are going to jail but by law you are being detained and you are not free to go. The officer must have probable cause to detain you and they do have the right to disarm you while you are detained. I have seen several posts about refusing to hand over your gun to a police officer. I don't recommend this. There are plenty of crooked and corrupt cops out there on the street who would love an excuse to kill someone and they know that they will get away with it. It is better to do what the cop says, keep your mouth shut, take mental notes, and as soon as you are free to go or are already booked depending on the outcome, write everything down, and call a lawyer if needed. Resisting a cop on the street will get you nowhere and if you have a gun that you don't turn over, you could easily be killed. Keep your mouth shut, do what you are told, and if the cop is in the wrong, then when you are safely away from the situation, get a lawyer and take legal action. You are much better off fighting the cop in a courtroom with an attorney than arguing on the side of the road. While some cops are good, don't trust them all. Some may be criminals themselves, take bribes, and are not mentally sound. If you are in fear for your life from a cop, there are things you can do. If they are trying to pull you over or otherwise stop you and something seems fishy, call 911 from your cell phone and do not stop. If it is legitimate, they will call backup and if you are dealing with ten cops instead of just one, then the one bad cop will probably not do you wrong in front of the other good cops. You can always defend your actions in court with an attorney if need be.
I agree to a point.

I will surrender my weapon AFTER I have cleared the chamber and unloaded it. If the cop refuses to allow it, I say that for both of our's safety, please contact your supervisor and I will remain cool, calm, and with my hands in plain sight.

Saying, "Officer, I will comply with your request, but you do not know my weapon, and I will carefully and slowly clear it before I turn it over to you. If you disagree with that, please contact your supervisor and have him attend the stop for safety reasons."

If he insists further, then I know I have an officer that has poor training. If I hand the weapon over to him, it will be in the holster. I will also make a formal complaint against the officer, because turning over a live weapon to someone that does not know your gun is foolish and dangerous.

NEVER trust a police officer. I cannot say this long enough or loud enough. NEVER, EVER, EVER trust a police officer. He may be a baby faced cherub looking boy that is fresh out of the academy, a kid that your girlfriend would run up to and pinch his cheeks... but he works for the legal system, and he has been trained to find a reason to arrest you, and put you in jail. He is an agent of the law, and his training only comes into play when he feels you have violated that law. He is not your friend, and if you are stopped, he already has probable cause to arrest you, and every question he asks is designed to prove that cause - NOT to disprove it. He is not there to let you go, he is there to arrest you, prosecute you, and he will sleep better that night if you are safely in jail. So once again, NEVER trust a police officer. Trust me in this, he does not trust you... no matter HOW nice he seems.

Now as to being disarmed. In Arkansas I was stopped and the trooper asked for my license. I told him that I had it, but it was in the glove box beside my firearm. He asked me to retrieve the weapon and place it on the dash, and I did. He took the license, went to his car, ran the numbers and eventually came back. He even gave me a huge break on the ticket! Nice Guy.

I also got stopped in Florida, and told the officer I was carrying. He said, "Than you for informing me, I appreciate it. The stop went fine, and I was verbally warned about a broken tail light. He did not ask for my weapon or even where it was located.

In Kentucky I told a ranger that I was armed, and that it was in the trunk. He asked what I had and I said an AR15. "Cool! Can I see it?" We had a great conversation.

In Florida I carry concealed, and carry a bigger gun. It does bulge, but does not look like a gun - which is all the law requires. I have some cops that I talk to occasionally when they are off duty, and we often talk guns, and they have seen it, but never said a word to me.

Lastly, cops are human and most feel they have a right to shoot you if you resist. If one is stupid enough to take a live weapon from someone, they need to be fired and sued. But not all officers are well trained, and many work for minimum wage or it is a part time job. They should knowthe law, but don't. They are dangerous. Handle with care.



But the most dangerous is the "True Blue" officer that knows the law, and banks on you NOT knowing it. They get away with everything they can, and make a game of it. They speed, drive recklessly and even race the cars from light to light. They need to be disciplined, and it takes people making calls, and getting involved to restrain them and make them act like the professionals they are. If we don't teach them, they will never learn.
 

jay75009

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
377
Location
somewhere, somewhere USA
imported post

i was just disarmed in sacarborough maine today. i was OCing in wal-mart, came out, went to my trunk to put in my goods, heard a car pull up behind me and a door open i looked back and it was grey/blue and i saw police on the back so i didnt pay attention and continued loading my goods.

Next thing i know i had a Glock in the back of my head and a hand on my strong hand wrist. The officer said "move and you get it" his partner then attempted to remove my weapon but couldnt figure out the * twist lock* on the snap of my strong model pancake holster. he fumbled for about 15 seconds before i said "rotate it back" and he finaly removed it.

i was placed in cuffs and seached, they found my digi voice recorder, wallet, keys and tac flashlight + spare mag.

sit me in the back of the car. and started running my license, asked if they could seach my car i politely replied "show me your warrant" they did search the trunk but it was open.

soon after a supervisor showed up and asked the two officers to follow him, they went about 20ft away , i couldnt hear what he said but his brow was furrowed, was talking very fast and pointing his finger between them and i then towards my weapon, throwing his hands up in the air.

he walked back over and let me out of the car, took the cuffs off, handed me my affects including weapon and said "F**king rookies! thier trying to get us all sued, im very sorry sir, i appologise on behalf of scarborough police department, your free to go".

ended well but scared the Sh*t out of me.
 

Sionadi

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2009
Messages
62
Location
Laytonville, California, USA
imported post

jay75009 wrote:
Next thing i know i had a Glock in the back of my head and a hand on my strong hand wrist. The officer said "move and you get it" his partner then attempted to remove my weapon
Glock to the head? and speaking like a thug? if that supervisor did not teach em i think you would have a very good lawsuit.
 

HankT

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
6,215
Location
Invisible Mode
imported post

jay75009 wrote:
i was just disarmed in sacarborough maine today. ...

...and said "F**king rookies! thier trying to get us all sued, im very sorry sir, i appologise on behalf of scarborough police department, your free to go".

ended well but scared the Sh*t out of me.


It really didn't "end well."

You have a cause of action against that PD. I hope you are considering a complaint and more.

Glad you're alive, j75009.


P.S. What part did Wal-Mart have in this unlawful stop? Let's not forget them.
 

Xader

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2009
Messages
70
Location
, Oregon, USA
imported post

Not what you mean, but I've had people try to disarms be numerous times.

The catch is that they were all tests of my holster's retention properties.

Im happy to say that nobody has been able to this date...
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
imported post

jay75009 wrote:
lol if i hadnt told them how, i guarentee they would had to remove my belt to remove the holster and weapon together lmao........stupid rookies
Everyone is a rookie ............... in the beginning.

Its not stupidity, it is lack of exposure/training, equating to knowledge.

I consider every contact with rookies/newbies as an opportunity to educate and when sometimes to convert. Knowledge is a wonderful thing; the lack of it is no reason to speak ill of them. We hope to make friends and influence others in a positive manner.

Yata hey
 

PointofView

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2009
Messages
118
Location
Yorktown, Virginia, USA
imported post

SlackwareRobert wrote:
How is your right to ccw in danger unless you admit it isn't a right to begin with.
Then it is always in danger by the leftist. OC on the other hand is a right,
and therefor not subject to the whims of a few nuts in so cal, just the 5 known
nuts who can't read in DC. It is a situational thing, there are times
when OC is the only lawful thing to do. Like VA with the resturant and booze.
I also have the restriction on cc, but since no permit to oc I don't violate my permit
by OC in bar since it forbids me to conceal.

We will just have to agree that we will never agree, and wish both our rights are
respected.
Great comment of misled blame.

How about the right taking away your civil rights in one fell swoop with the Patriot Act? Do you realize this bypassed attorney client privilege, illegal search and seizure, etc. I suppose we should just point left again since the republican president did that one because of a knee jerk reaction to a terrorist attack.

Blind, blind blind. Look at the right and left but look on an instance by instance basis. You are so busy looking left you don't look right.

The same applies to a single incident of an OC grab where the owner does not make it out of the situation alive. This does not speak to OC carrying not being worth its weight in steel as a deterrent.

V/R

Blame game objector
Master of reality-checker of unwarranted comments which blame one sided politics
Bringer of light
 
Top