T
thomaswoodfin5
Guest
While the opinion is not in our favor, I have to admit that seems to be consistent with the case and statutory law.
As you know, the problem is one of the precise boundaries. Nobody knows where the real limits WMA.
It is not unlike Hot Springs, before changing the law allows in national parks. About 8 or 9 years, I wrote the NPS and asked about HSNP limits, and problems in other jurisdictions where the streets of the city fell within NP.
I returned a non-answer that basically said, "We do not anticipate charging anyone who is legally carrying a firearm under state law, provided they are not in a Park Service building."
Cold comfort if you are the one being charged.
As you know, the problem is one of the precise boundaries. Nobody knows where the real limits WMA.
It is not unlike Hot Springs, before changing the law allows in national parks. About 8 or 9 years, I wrote the NPS and asked about HSNP limits, and problems in other jurisdictions where the streets of the city fell within NP.
I returned a non-answer that basically said, "We do not anticipate charging anyone who is legally carrying a firearm under state law, provided they are not in a Park Service building."
Cold comfort if you are the one being charged.