• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Target Encounter, Everett, Washington

OldCurlyWolf

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
907
Location
Oklahoma
I would have called the PD much earlier than they were called and the moment he touched my weapon, he would have drawn back a stub, figuratively speaking. But he wouldn't have been screaming and cussing at me(disorderly conduct) because of being unable to speak for a while.
 

acmariner99

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
655
Location
Renton, Wa
When he made the grab for the gun, I secured it with one hand, switched to weak side forward, which had the secondary effect of putting another step between me and him. Raising my voice also grabbed an employee's attention as well. And the verbal cue coupled with body language finally convinced him to take a few steps back, because I was ready to draw down on a moment's notice. Given a the warning I gave him, I would not have let him get that close to me again. I have very little physical defense training. Considering what he was doing, I would have preferred to have my gun in my hand as opposed to my cell phone. In hindsight I wonder if he would have come at me if I had moved towards my phone. Ill never know but he would have either come at me or backed off. He was a real looney so I was anticipating him to do something stupid. All I could do was stand my ground because if I had backed off he would have run off yelling "Oh my God there is a man with a gun in the store!!" Keeping him there kept it from getting a LOT worse.
 
Last edited:

acmariner99

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
655
Location
Renton, Wa
Just so that myself and the readers can get a better image of how exactly this thing looked in our heads:

Did he seem like a political extremist?
How old did the man look?
What was he wearing?
Did he seem like he was the kind of guy who would have done the same to a Law Enforcement Officer?
.


His clothing seemed old. He did strike me as someone who didn't have his ducks in a row or felt he had nothing to lose by trying to get me to do something -- which is a very big reason why I reacted the way I did. He WANTED me to draw. It seemed very obvious by his behavior that he wanted an excuse to sue me. I didn't give him one.
 

eye95

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
13,524
Location
Fairborn, Ohio, USA
His clothing seemed old. He did strike me as someone who didn't have his ducks in a row or felt he had nothing to lose by trying to get me to do something -- which is a very big reason why I reacted the way I did. He WANTED me to draw. It seemed very obvious by his behavior that he wanted an excuse to sue me. I didn't give him one.

Suicide by OCer?
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
I can't remember where, but one state ruled that you're not allowed to record officers acting in their official capacity without their permission under the guise of their wiretap laws which was the same as Washington's. Something to consider before recording a confrontation in a two party state. So yeah, check case law before you decide that "Oh, I'm in public, there's no reasonable expectation of privacy here" because some dumbass courts decided that yeah, there is, atleast where police misconduct is involved.
icon_rolleyes.gif

Not in Washington, Police have less expectation of privacy if acting in their duties.

Read State vs. Flora (Washington State of course)

We have had several cases, we can record anything in public, private conversations can be recorded as long as you state something to the effect eye95 said and that statement is on the recording.
 

Jack House

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2010
Messages
2,611
Location
I80, USA
Not in Washington, Police have less expectation of privacy if acting in their duties.

Read State vs. Flora (Washington State of course)

We have had several cases, we can record anything in public, private conversations can be recorded as long as you state something to the effect eye95 said and that statement is on the recording.
That's good to hear.
 

since9

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
6,964
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
This happened to me yesterday 5/21/10. There is a lot about this event on a similar thread in the Washington State forum. I appreciate your thoughts about how I reacted. Many have said that maybe I was too nice with the guy and his actions could constitute a threat to my safety.

Could be! I'd have ended the "discussion" much sooner. See below.

I deemed that drawing was a bad move because he was ultimately trying to just piss me off.

Excellent deeming!

...

I had a scary encounter with a man at target in Everett today. Me and a friend were going shopping, talking about permits for certain states as he was curious. We get to the shoe section and he proceeds to go about his business. As I am looking at a pair of potential hiking shoes the man in question takes one look at my side and the following dialouge ensues (to the best of my knowledge):

Man: What is that? Points to my side

...

Man: @#$% you man, I will talk to the cops
Me: fine have a nice day

(he finally leaves then calls over a store worker)
Employee: You ok, is there a problem
Me: ma'am, what is your store policy about open carry of firearms?
Employee: I don't think its allowed but I am not sure
Me: Ok, how would you like to proceed?
Employee: Lets go up to the front, I am not sure, but I will be calling the cops
Me: I will cooperate fully with you and law enforcement
Employee: Thank you, calls up a security officer
Security: Everything ok

By this time my nerves are frayed and details are sketchy, so I will give the short version: the security officer and the target employee call 911 who then surprisingly tell them that I am ok and within the law and have no problem with me carrying!! They also thanked me for staying calm and being informed about what i was doing, (thank you OCDO!!!!!!)

Quite, and that's my largest worry, that my own "fix it" mentality to attempt to over-control or contain the issue. Maintaining control of self and the situation is key, provided one with with what's given, and that includes the other human beings. Attempting to bowl them over or wrestle control from them almost invariably backfires.

The police were not dispatched and the man got away scott free, but the store was professional about their dealing with me and I told them as such and would be honored to participate in their business.

A hearty "Thank you for your help in successfully resolving this matter!" goes a long way. :)

Oh, I did tell them that the idiot tried to grab my gun and he was being a disturbance and a potential threat to public safety

Ooops... Did he really? I'm back-reading...

Man: Hey, what would you do if I did this (tries to grab the grip)

Crap, that's way out of line. I'd probably have Aikido'd his butt to the ground, said "Citizen's Arrest! Call 911! Call security!" over the guy's screams of agony (wrist and elbow locks are excrutiatingly painful, but the pain is fleeting, at best, once the grip is released)

This scenario is a lot like what a certain former LEO told me would get me arrested for "disturbing the peace."

First, you did everything right. You were fully within your right to remain there and continue to ask the guy to leave. I'd have given him a polite, but authoritative-sounding "come with me, please" by the third round and headed straight for the manager's office without another word, except to the manager to report, "I was minding my own business over there when this gentleman began accosting me. I asked him to stop, and to leave my table, but he has refused. Will you please call security?"

That's perhaps the best way to send the following clear messages:

1. To the other guy, that you're not taking his BS, that you're seeking the store owner's assistance, and that the other guy is probably now the one in hot water.

2. To the manager that you're simply a peacable, law-abiding citizen attempting to conduct business in their store.

3. To security (summoned by the manager) that you're not a threat, nor are embroiled in some sort of argument with the other guy.

Please keep in mind this action may result in the other guy blowing his top, at which point you'd have that issue to deal with, but how is that different than what may have happened if you'd remained at the table? Now you have the store manager as a witness, and as the manager's area is covered by store cameras, you have that evidence, too.

On the other hand, as soon as you begin walking towards the manager's office, the other guy may just walk off. The other guy might also wait until he's sure you're serious about talking to the manager before bolting. Either way, I'd still report him.

In addition, I'd have gone to the police station and reported him for an attempted gun grab. That's a huge no-no in most states. It appears the only question that was put to them at the time, however, was the legality of your OC. That's fine, so why would they come out? If they'd been made aware of the attempted gun grab by the other guy, they may have been a bit more interested.

Suicide by OCer?

The thought crossed my mind, although I think some folks are moved by an incessant insecurity-driven need to test or assert their authority. The whole progression of the other guy's conversation smacks of a mental issue, beginning at first with a slow poke or prod, followed by more and more, to the point where he attempts to grab (or at least touch) the OP's firearm. At any juncture, a swift rebuff could have stopped him cold, but it might also have driven him into a frenzy.

Can't really know for sure. My brother's always had a calming effect on folks like this, which is probably why one of his more successful jobs was working with patients at a psychiatric institution. Meanwhile, I just tend to tick people like that off.

I experienced a similar encounter, a long time ago, but it didn't involve a firearm.
 
Last edited:

RayBurton72

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
235
Location
Greensboro, ,
Just a side note - in many places, once the grab for the gun is made, it can be construed as attempted armed robbery and/or aggravated assault. Gun grabbing is a lot more serious than most people realize.
 

acmariner99

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
655
Location
Renton, Wa
Just a side note - in many places, once the grab for the gun is made, it can be construed as attempted armed robbery and/or aggravated assault. Gun grabbing is a lot more serious than most people realize.

+1 totally agree. Since then I have taken time and effort to refine my tactics and improve on my method of carry. I have a better holster, learned a few tricks to reduce the duration of such an encounter, use a digital recorder, and a couple of ideas on how to get the Guy off me. I've learned to be patient and use self control but also to put my foot down.
 

phoneguy

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
447
Location
, ,
+1 totally agree. Since then I have taken time and effort to refine my tactics and improve on my method of carry. I have a better holster, learned a few tricks to reduce the duration of such an encounter, use a digital recorder, and a couple of ideas on how to get the Guy off me. I've learned to be patient and use self control but also to put my foot down.

I go to that Target Store in Everett. Can you share with us the few tricks you have learned?
 

Kirbinator

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2010
Messages
903
Location
Middle of the map, Alabama
I'd suggest spending some time (a year or two) in an aikido dojo and learning a few tricks as well. Of course, when someone in ON you, it's time for jujitsu. There is a little crossover there, the break is not far from the bend.
 

acmariner99

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
655
Location
Renton, Wa
Tricks

Here are a few tricks (or things I learned) I picked up from feedback by other OCers here on the forum, friends, and my own analysis:

1) Holster -- ok not so much a trick as an added advantage. The holster I had at the time was the standard XD holster. Unstable, wobbled, and was generally not very secure. I have a new holster that isnt a locked retention holster but has two belt loops and is far more snug against my body. Its easier to grab the gun if it looks like its hanging off the holster.

2) Disassociate: I hung around WAY too long. If I sense direct hostility towards my carrying of a gun. Get help and get out. And do not let it get to a point where the guy would start yelling "there is a guy with a GUN!!". Some clever humor might diffuse and confuse and create a chance to get help.

3) Voice recorder: I has one and I use it

4) Create distance: find ways to withdraw and not let a bad guy get close enough to attempt a gun grab -- this goes along with number 2.

5) Simple application of force: even I can quickly grab the arm and lock and twist it behind him. Simple, painful, and effective.

6) Use the legal system: especially if number 5 must be used, charge the guy, lock him up! Even in Washington there were multiple felonies committed that day. It was very obvious by the attitude of people in the store and store management that they knew the bad guy wasnt me. I was minding my own business and was deliberately and openly harassed.
 
K

KansasScout

Guest
I am going to point out that if you were carrying concealed, this would not have happened. This is the advantage of CCW. And a clear disadvantage to open carry. Tactically, CCW is always better.
While I support the right of us to open carry, I do believe it's not always the smartest tactical move.
Firearms are increasingly accepted by mainline society and this is both an example of that and of the hysterical reactions guns can provoke.
don't get me wrong. I support open carry. It's just not always the best option.
 

Axctal

Regular Member
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
24
Location
, ,
The moment he started yelling "OMG!! LOOK!! Man with a GUN !!!" - I would report him to manager AND police as trying to incite public panic
 

acmariner99

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2010
Messages
655
Location
Renton, Wa
I would like to point out to kansas guy that I had no ccw at the time. I had no option except to open carry and I wasn't going to not be able to protect myself in everett, wa. Now that I have a wa cpl, I use a little more discretion but I won't let the attitudes of others determine how I choose to carry
 

Dreamer

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Messages
5,360
Location
Grennsboro NC
I am going to point out that if you were carrying concealed, this would not have happened. This is the advantage of CCW. And a clear disadvantage to open carry. Tactically, CCW is always better.


No!

CCW is a crime, and it is NEVER better than lawful carry (OC or CC with a permit).

Nowhere in ANY state is the license/permit to carry concealed called a "CCW". The ONLY place the acronym "CCW" or the phrase "Carrying a Concealed Weapon" appears in law, statute or code of ANY state is to describe a CRIME...

In Washington (where this even occurred) it is called a "License to Carry a Concealed Pistol" (LCCP).

In Arizona, the home state of the OP, it is called a Concealed Weapons Permit (CWP).

And in Kansas (where KansasScout is from) it is called a Concealed Carry Handgun License (CCHL).

Again, I reiterate that there is not a SINGLE state in the union that calls it's permit a "CCW". And again, I will stress that the ONLY time that the phrase "CCW" is used in the law is to describe a CRIME.

Please, please, please stop using the term "CCW" to describe a lawful, legal method of carry. The abbreviation "CCW" is a crime, not a permit. Please STOP using it.

If you don't know what a particular state calls it's permit, then use the phrase Concealed Carry Permit, or call the act of lawfully carrying concealed "CC", like we call Open Carry "OC".

If you want to use the correct term for any given state, it is REALLY easy to look up. Simply go to this website:

http://www.usacarry.com/concealed_carry_permit_information.html

and click on the state, and it will give you ALL the info you need to know about that particular state's permit/license/endorsement.

But PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop using the term "CCW" to talk about lawful concealed carry. Using "CCW" to talk about concealed carry in a legal manner is like using "brandishing" to talk about lawful modes of OC--it is wrong, it is incorrect, and it makes you look uneducated and uninformed...

If you continue to advise people to engage in illegal modes of carry (CCW) I will report you to the Moderators. Rule #15 of this forum clearly states that promoting illegal acts will NOT be tolerated:

(15) WE ADVOCATE FOR THE 'LAW-ABIDING' ONLY: Posts advocating illegal acts of any kind are NOT welcome here. Even if you feel that a law is unconstitutional we do not break it, we repeal it or defeat it in the courts.

http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/misc.php?do=showrules
 
Last edited:

ooghost1oo

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2009
Messages
262
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
Insanity. Well done.

I haven't been in that situation myself, so I can't speak truthfully for what I'd do, but my first thought when he grabbed for your gun was 'guard gun with right hand, launch left palm into face--hopefully bloody nose'.
 

donsk

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
21
Location
, ,
No!

CCW is a crime, and it is NEVER better than lawful carry (OC or CC with a permit).

Nowhere in ANY state is the license/permit to carry concealed called a "CCW". The ONLY place the acronym "CCW" or the phrase "Carrying a Concealed Weapon" appears in law, statute or code of ANY state is to describe a CRIME...

In Washington (where this even occurred) it is called a "License to Carry a Concealed Pistol" (LCCP).

In Arizona, the home state of the OP, it is called a Concealed Weapons Permit (CWP).

And in Kansas (where KansasScout is from) it is called a Concealed Carry Handgun License (CCHL).

Again, I reiterate that there is not a SINGLE state in the union that calls it's permit a "CCW". And again, I will stress that the ONLY time that the phrase "CCW" is used in the law is to describe a CRIME.

Please, please, please stop using the term "CCW" to describe a lawful, legal method of carry. The abbreviation "CCW" is a crime, not a permit. Please STOP using it.

If you don't know what a particular state calls it's permit, then use the phrase Concealed Carry Permit, or call the act of lawfully carrying concealed "CC", like we call Open Carry "OC".

If you want to use the correct term for any given state, it is REALLY easy to look up. Simply go to this website:

http://www.usacarry.com/concealed_carry_permit_information.html

and click on the state, and it will give you ALL the info you need to know about that particular state's permit/license/endorsement.

But PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE stop using the term "CCW" to talk about lawful concealed carry. Using "CCW" to talk about concealed carry in a legal manner is like using "brandishing" to talk about lawful modes of OC--it is wrong, it is incorrect, and it makes you look uneducated and uninformed...

If you continue to advise people to engage in illegal modes of carry (CCW) I will report you to the Moderators. Rule #15 of this forum clearly states that promoting illegal acts will NOT be tolerated:

(15) WE ADVOCATE FOR THE 'LAW-ABIDING' ONLY: Posts advocating illegal acts of any kind are NOT welcome here. Even if you feel that a law is unconstitutional we do not break it, we repeal it or defeat it in the courts.

http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/misc.php?do=showrules

Someone wake up on the wrong side of the bed? This thread isn't about concealed carry laws...he wasn't citing laws, etc, he was talking about the tactical side of things.

If I tell my buddy who is drunk not to get in the car because he might get a DWD - and he gets out of the car do I come across as uneducated and uninformed because I didn't cite the correct law? I just don't want him to drive, who cares if it is the correct wording? If his post was about the specific law I would agree with you, but it is about the tactical side of things, not laws.

- As far as his actual post -

There are arguments to be made for both sides on the OC CC debate. In some cases, OC'ers may actually prevent a crime from happening just because someone sees they have a gun, while in other cases, they may be targeted in a crime because they have a gun. There is no hard and fast rule for which is better tactically.

Making this up...but: Lets say a 17 year old on hard times walks into a 7-11 with a knife in his pocket and is going to rob the place. You are over getting a slurpee - and he sees you have a gun on your side. This situation could go one of two ways - either the kid walks out of the store because you had gun, or he now targets you because you have a gun. If he walks out, then you just prevented an incident without having to draw, fire, etc. If he makes a move on you, hopefully you are aware enough of your surroundings and are able to deal with the situation. If you were CCing - then he would rob the place with a knife, and now you have to draw to deal with the situation.
 
Top