WalkingWolf
Regular Member
Let me get this straight? YOU think jokes about RAPE is acceptable?
And you have the nerve to claim I bait!
And you have the nerve to claim I bait!
Let me get this straight? YOU think jokes about RAPE is acceptable?
And you have the nerve to claim I bait!
I remember when the radical feminists starting trying to equate every off color joke in the workplace to sexual assault. Their clear intent was to elevate fairly minor offenses into something far worse. It was rather quickly realized by most sensible people that such tactics were at least as likely to instead diminish the severity of rape. After all, if hearing a mildly offensive off-color joke (which I will add is WAY less offensive than seeing prostitutes and drug dealers engaging in coitus in a public park) over a cubicle wall is the same as being raped, then maybe rape isn't all that bad. I mean, most guys haven't been raped. But most of us have heard a joke at one point or another that we thought was inappropriate, offensive, or not funny. The joke isn't all that bad.
Trying to equate everything you dislike to rape is no different than equating every government action with which you disagree to the Nazis. In other words, trotting out rape analogies is a form of Godwyn's law.
Congrats.
Charles
WTF are you on crack?
Let me get this straight? YOU think jokes about RAPE is acceptable?
And you have the nerve to claim I bait!
Your post was clear that you find jokes in the work place acceptable that are sexually related, plus it was in response to rape post. I find your position disgusting to say the least.
According to some guy from Utah that plays bagpipes liberty dies from people exercising their rights in ways they don't agree with.
...true, but they may need to pay a fee...No one ever needed a protected right to do what people like and agree with.
Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on Thursday touted the bill, which would ban magazines of more than 10 rounds, hours after reports circulated that police had foiled a mass shooting plot aimed at Congress.
“Think of the damage that someone could do in the U.S. Capitol with 30 rounds,” he said at a briefing.
Clearly that was a fake black flag event. Police never stop stuff before it happens unless its planned by them. The guy was just exercising his 1a rights. [emoji39]http://thehill.com/regulation/231884-democrat-uses-capitol-shooting-threat-in-push-for-ammo-limits
Clearly illegal action/threats. Perpetrator Stopped by police before anyone was hurt.
Still they want to ban stuff.
It's why arguing about a photo op is stupid. The gun grabbers just don't care about the pretense, they will use anything -- logic and facts be damned.
Clearly that was a fake black flag event. Police never stop stuff before it happens unless its planned by them. The guy was just exercising his 1a rights. [emoji39]
Your right they should have let the maybe become a reality? Then pick up the pieces later? Which is it? Stop it before (maybe) or wait till its over and people are dead? Just not happy either way...http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...rrested-after-threatening-us-capitol-shooting
They foiled a maybe.
Its funny how quickly apologist will justify their whole existence and trampling of liberties because they maybe might have done a few good things.
Your right they should have let the maybe become a reality? Then pick up the pieces later? Which is it? Stop it before (maybe) or wait till its over and people are dead? Just not happy either way...
So when did they contact you?No primus, but it would be nice if the FBI didn't consistently find confused/out of sorts nincompoops and recruit, foster, cultivate, radicalize, train, arm, etc. just to finally arrest them and somehow claim a "victory" for that which THEY created.
Nearly all of the "foiled" terrorist plots since 9-11 have been started under FBI direction. At least they have never repeated giving their patsies live explosives like they did in the 93 WTC bombing.
Your right they should have let the maybe become a reality? Then pick up the pieces later? Which is it? Stop it before (maybe) or wait till its over and people are dead? Just not happy either way...
Your right they should have let the maybe become a reality? Then pick up the pieces later? Which is it? Stop it before (maybe) or wait till its over and people are dead? Just not happy either way...
So when did it become ok to arrest somebody for not committing a crime?
If a person stands outside a corner store doing absolutely nothing wrong and is arrested to prevent the person from robbing the store, how is that any different? I think I see your point though. Lets start arresting people proactively. I'm sure you've seen the movie Minority Report.