Fourth Amendment:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,
and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation,
and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
The supreme court intentionally misinterpreted the fourth amendment just like the did the second amendment. It took 231 years to set the record straight regarding the second amendment. When will the Supremes correct the fourth amendment?
There are three sections to the fourth amendment, all connected with a conjunction, "and." "And" is used to connect words of the same part of speech, clauses, or sentences that are to be taken jointly.
The first phrase says that the people are to be secure against "unreasonable" searches.
The second phrase tells you what is unreasonable. A search is unreasonable without a warrant supported by oath.
The third part makes clear that the warrant cannot be a general warrant. The warrant mus be particular or specific in nature.
So, until the Supremes fixes this fraud we will continue to have our rights violated.
Remember, Supremes have been winding back the commerce clause, but the lower courts refuse to comply with United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995).
If the fourth amendment's false interpenetration was corrected, Terry v. Ohio would evaporate, as well as all the other cases tied to Terry.