OCDO - MI The Pit Shoot! Get The Day Off NOW!!!

[eastmeyers]

It is "pointless and stupid" to engage in insult.

This is all you have done here, this is purely what you have come here to do. I know it, you know it, everyone reading this knows it. So don't try to deny it, and if you do, just know, every will see through it. Now, why don't you leave, or at least explain your reasoning for trolling this entire thread. Why try to ruin an event in another state, that you wont be attending and have nothing to do with anyways? Why? Why troll? Why?

 

[wrightme]

This is all you have done here, this is purely what you have come here to do. I know it, you know it, everyone reading this knows it. So don't try to deny it, and if you do, just know, every will see through it. Now, why don't you leave, or at least explain your reasoning for trolling this entire thread. Why try to ruin an event in another state, that you wont be attending and have nothing to do with anyways? Why? Why troll? Why?

No, that is simply not the case. Find one post where you think I have engaged in insult. Yet, in return, I have received many insults.


I disagree with the decision to "encourage" people to not bring children, and I addressed that, without insulting others.

Why deny children at the event? That is my question, and has been my question.

 

[eastmeyers]

No, that is simply not the case. Find one post where you think I have engaged in insult. Yet, in return, I have received many insults.


I disagree with the decision to "encourage" people to not bring children, and I addressed that, without insulting others.

Why deny children at the event? That is my question, and has been my question.

Your lying, and I will call you out on it without issue. You claim you have come here to question, and not to insult, yet the collection of your posts, starting from the beginning, in this thread, is just one enormous insult to this thread, and this sub-forum. You are purposely trying to harm an outing, where like-minded people can collect together and socialize, I don't know if your doing it for fun, or because your jealous because your too far away to join, but your a child yourself for doing so. Now to address your outright LIE, you say you have a question of:
"Why deny children at the event? That is my question, and has been my question."
Well here is the proof of your LIE, this is NOT your question, it is the disguise of your insult, because if someone logically did have this question, they would simply read post #1 in this thread, and it would be clear. The reason was explained. PERIOD. Who are you to question it?
Sociability
Safety
It was even made VERY clear in post #1, that it was COMPLETELY legal to bring children, just maybe not a great idea. Now like I have pointed out, you are a liar, you are a troll, and everyone sees through you, why continue to troll. It is obviouse, the "reason" you are here is not "for the children", but this is clearly your disguise just like the Brady Bunch and the Librial Media (but think of the children), but you are here to troll. I ask you again, WHY ARE YOU HERE, WHY ARE YOU TROLLING?

 

[wrightme]

Your lying, and I will call you out on it without issue.

Then you have let your emotions rule your thoughts.


I disagree with your choice to "highly suggest parents not bring children". That IS all. The rest is a construct of you and the others who desire to insult those who disagree with them.

 

[wrightme]

It was even made VERY clear in post #1, that it was COMPLETELY legal to bring children, just maybe not a great idea. Now like I have pointed out, you are a liar, you are a troll, and everyone sees through you, why continue to troll. It is obviouse, the "reason" you are here is not "for the children", but this is clearly your disguise just like the Brady Bunch and the Librial Media (but think of the children), but you are here to troll. I ask you again, WHY ARE YOU HERE, WHY ARE YOU TROLLING?

Actually, that specific is not that evident. You recognize legality, but "highly suggest" to not let children attend. As for 'but think of the children," that is more like what you were doing. I encourage parents to INCLUDE their children in the exercise and practice of 2nd Amendment activities, where legal to do so.

It is NOT suggest to bring children to this event, although while perfectly legal for children to use firearms at a shooting range, there is expected to be many people attending this UNOFFICIAL event, where firearms will be un-holstered and fired on an active range. To limit the odds of an accident it is HIGHLY suggest that NO children attend this UNOFFICIAL event.

Why do you feel it is trolling to point out that I disagree with your choice to limit this event to only adults? Further, I have left this thread completely alone, until once again, someone had to choose to come on here and insult me directly. Do you label them troll for insulting someone who only differs in opinion from them? Or only me as my opinion is different than yours?

 

[wrightme]

I ask you again, WHY ARE YOU HERE, WHY ARE YOU TROLLING?

I have said it before, but it appears that repeating is in order. I disagree with your choice to limit the event to only adults, and I have stated why. For some reason, you choose to ignore that, and assume I am only trolling. You ARE allowing your emotions to override your thinking apparatus.

 

[stainless1911]

This is what exclusion, trolling, (which I too have done), ostracizing, threatening, implying, stereotyping, assuming, belittling, can do to an otherwise healthy and productive thread and event. Too bad.

 

[Nexela]

Even without the request to not bring children I would not bring my children for a number of reasons safety being number 1.

The pit is small and even just 10 people has a crowded feeling to it. now throw some tykes in the mix and the chance for even a minor accident greatly increases. Not to mention kids are natuarly curious no matter how well behaved they are.

If you have young shooters I still don't think this event would be wise for them. After all they are young shooters. And not all young shooters are still children (that is debatable).


I am going to try and make this event depending on my workload.

Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk

 

[NHCGRPR45]

No, that is simply not the case. Find one post where you think I have engaged in insult. Yet, in return, I have received many insults.


I disagree with the decision to "encourage" people to not bring children, and I addressed that, without insulting others.

Why deny children at the event? That is my question, and has been my question.

Asked and answered, yet you seem to not like the answer you get, so you keep asking. Childish behaviour, you get 20 minutes in the corner, no phone, and no internet time. Grounded sir.

Then you have let your emotions rule your thoughts.


I disagree with your choice to "highly suggest parents not bring children". That IS all. The rest is a construct of you and the others who desire to insult those who disagree with them.

What? C'mon guy I stated I didn't agree with the rules as posted but yet I have the abillity to look beyond what I don't like and understand the reasoning behind it. Can my daughter be around others uncased and potentially loaded firearms? Yes, has she yes. Knob Creek comes to mind, but I am able as an ADULT to understand the wishes and the underlying reason for the request. It comes with being all grown up and placing others first. Only children of a young age would continue to nit pick and ask again and again for answer they like not the one they got. Stop, I mean your grounded after all.

 

[NHCGRPR45]

Oh, yes I forgot Another way to stop unruely children is to IGNORE them, don't respond to his messages no matter how borish his statement. Simply continue on as if trolls don't exist! I mean who really looks under a bridge before driving or walking over it?:banana:

 

[stainless1911]

I see both sides here. Kids should be around guns and thier owners regularly. My girl is fine with them. On the other hand, there are some kids that I wouldnt trust around firearms.

 

[wrightme]

Seriously? This is the public face you desire to present? There is somewhat of an expectation that we are adults, and would be expected to act as such.

Asked and answered, yet you seem to not like the answer you get, so you keep asking. Childish behaviour, you get 20 minutes in the corner, no phone, and no internet time. Grounded sir.

What? C'mon guy I stated I didn't agree with the rules as posted but yet I have the abillity to look beyond what I don't like and understand the reasoning behind it. Can my daughter be around others uncased and potentially loaded firearms? Yes, has she yes. Knob Creek comes to mind, but I am able as an ADULT to understand the wishes and the underlying reason for the request. It comes with being all grown up and placing others first. Only children of a young age would continue to nit pick and ask again and again for answer they like not the one they got. Stop, I mean your grounded after all.

Are you able, as an adult, to avoid insulting those who have different opinions than you do?

Having the ability to "look beyond" to a reason behind something does not automatically make it correct to avoid voicing a disagreement.

Don't you think it is just a little bit hypocritical for you to claim someone else is behaving childish, while conducting yourself that way?


I am, as an adult, capable of understanding the underlying reasons behind the restriction the OP presented. I chose to voice my disagreement with that restriction. For that, I get repeatedly insulted. If that is really the behavior you and those you associate with prefer, I can see why the earlier comment was made:

We have a hard enough time keeping everyone together as is without people like him coming in from other states causing issues or fanning the flames.

As for your subsequent comment, do you see that I have been leaving this thread alone? Except when some of you act as you complain about me supposedly acting?

Insult me, and I will respond. As you should easily be able to tell, I do NOT respond in kind, though the posts directed towards me have included content more fitting of the description "childish" than any of my posts here. If you are worried about how discussions such as this appear, maybe a little more introspection is in order.

 

[Evil Creamsicle]

Seriously? This is the public face you desire to present? There is somewhat of an expectation that we are adults, and would be expected to act as such.



Are you able, as an adult, to avoid insulting those who have different opinions than you do?

Having the ability to "look beyond" to a reason behind something does not automatically make it correct to avoid voicing a disagreement.

Don't you think it is just a little bit hypocritical for you to claim someone else is behaving childish, while conducting yourself that way?


I am, as an adult, capable of understanding the underlying reasons behind the restriction the OP presented. I chose to voice my disagreement with that restriction. For that, I get repeatedly insulted. If that is really the behavior you and those you associate with prefer, I can see why the earlier comment was made:

As for your subsequent comment, do you see that I have been leaving this thread alone? Except when some of you act as you complain about me supposedly acting?

Insult me, and I will respond. As you should easily be able to tell, I do NOT respond in kind, though the posts directed towards me have included content more fitting of the description "childish" than any of my posts here. If you are worried about how discussions such as this appear, maybe a little more introspection is in order.

Unfortunately you suffer from a similar issue. Whenever someone offers an opinion that disagrees with yours, you seem to construe it as an insult.

I merely pointed out that a quote was misused out of context, and only 'directly insulted' your capacity for critical thinking when you misconstrued that as an opinion on the matter.

Say what you will about having a simple question to ask, but there are many more productive ways you could have obtained that clarification than the posts you chose to make. And before you respond in kind, you aren't the only one.

I never once stated my opinions on the issue, and yet was responded to just as hostile as if I had told you your children couldn't own guns someday.

I'm not absolving myself of this nonsense, but certainly you are fueling it as much as anyone else.

To All:
If you have a question ask it like an adult. If you have an answer, provide it like an adult.

If anyone can't do this, don't post anymore. This got stupid a page ago. Lets try to focus on something constructive.

 

[wrightme]

Unfortunately you suffer from a similar issue. Whenever someone offers an opinion that disagrees with yours, you seem to construe it as an insult.

No, I do not seem to construe differing opinions as insult. But, I DO consider comments that claim I am acting childish to be insults. Do you not agree in that specific?

 

[Evil Creamsicle]

No, I do not seem to construe differing opinions as insult. But, I DO consider comments that claim I am acting childish to be insults. Do you not agree in that specific?

I was speaking in general terms, regarding posts such as that by NHCGRPR45. But I will admit that I did resort to personal insult. But only after you twice misconstrued the point of my post and responded in a way that I considered to be unnecessarily rude. Which I considered also to be childish.

 

[dougwg]

Ignore HIM!

 

[wrightme]

Ignore HIM!

Why? Do you typically ignore opinions that differ from your own?

 

[smellslikemichigan]

time for this thread to die

 

[wrightme]

time for this thread to die

This ranks as one of the most intelligent comments in this thread.

 

[stainless1911]

Seconded.