TechnoWeenie said:
LOL. Assuming of course, he follows the law.
I know if I were a convicted felon, I'd carry anyway.
What a great way to show how law abiding we are. I know it is you but it reflects on ALL of us that OC.
Not only would I carry, but I'd carry in areas formerly 'off limits' as a law abiding citizen...
At that point, becoming a felon and 'losing' my rights would no longer be a deterrent.
I guess you'd also tag me as a 'radical' if I wanted to get revenge for being wrongfully convicted of a crime...
This is a good example that justifies the anti-gun forces' suspicion that, although pro-gunners swear they will follow the lawful regulations in the area of firearm ownership and carry, they really cannot be counted on to do that.
Some (more than just a few) pro-gunners really, really won't follow any laws they find inconvenient.
If I were an anti-gunner, I wouldn't trust a pro-gunner's promises about anything. Some of us will say just about any dang thing, including specific public advocacy of clearly illegal acts. Heck, I'm a pro-gunner and I don't trust 'em to fulfill their promises.
Oh well, cost of doing business . . . just gotta carry those guys on our backs . . .