• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

OC Advocate Arrested

massivedesign

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
865
Location
Olympia, Washington, USA
I'd say it boils down to four questions, in the State of Washington, combined with officer discretion.

1. Intent

2. Knowledge

2. Criminal Negligence, and

4. Recklessness.

If one of those four was not present, no crime. If they were present, but the officer understood them to be practical for the situation, no crime.

Am I far off where you were headed?

Can you provide a cite for the 4 requirements? I can think of A LOT of situations where criminal actions can and have been prosecuted...
 

amlevin

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Messages
5,937
Location
North of Seattle, Washington, USA
I'd say it boils down to four questions, in the State of Washington, combined with officer discretion.

1. Intent

2. Knowledge

2. Criminal Negligence, and

4. Recklessness.

If one of those four was not present, no crime. If they were present, but the officer understood them to be practical for the situation, no crime.

Am I far off where you were headed?

Actually I was just making an off handed comment on my earlier post re: Cutting tags off mattresses and furniture. Wasn't really a serious question although I do think it might make for an interesting discussion all on it's own.
 

sudden valley gunner

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
16,674
Location
Whatcom County
I spoke to Tyler when he was released, there is more to the story, like he said (and I have said). Bellingham Police are lying bastards, I am dealing with another personal scenario with some other police here that shows they don't care about the truth they care about convictions and are very very anti gun.

It is public record but basically Ty was convicted for DV.

Here is something to think about why was Martha's gun confiscated and brought up in the reports and charges although it had nothing to do with her "fight" and wasn't on her person at the time, (it was in the car).

Why are Tyler's calls to the police not brought up and part of what happened? What else are we to do when blocked in? His ex and her family are douchebags for fostering and causing what they did.

Most important of all I am glad that baby Jared has his loving doting parents back that was what made me most sick of all was that great kid loosing his parents who loved him so much.
 
Top