Idontownone revealed as a fraud.

[AZkopper]

imported post

AWDstylez wrote:

GTFO you whiny little bitch. As usual, you're drawing conclusions based on your own ASSumptions.

AZD...this was a discussion, and you went rude and vuglar. Nobody but you on this thread was behaving this way. If you can't make your points articulately, at least refrain from juvenile outbursts. It dosen't do your position any good and it makes you look like a faux-elitist fool.

 

[Citizen]

imported post

XD40coyote wrote:

Well when I was 5 years old I was mad because I couldn't dress in the tiger costume every day at my kindergarten. In factI think I only got to wear it once.

I think I was born a furry LOL.

A natural-born Hobbes (of Calvin & Hobbes)?

 

[david.ross]

imported post

XD40coyote wrote:

I think I was born a furry LOL.

You should come to Anthrocon next year. ^_^

thx997303 wrote:

Look kangaroo, we all know that you are the furry.

Oh, I'm not disputing myself being a furry. There are many drama llamas and others who cause drama in the community. We have a saying...

I read the opencarry.org forums and sometimes also see this from people who cause drama and leave...

 

[thx997303]

imported post

I know you're not denying it, I'm just commenting, and yes some people are full of drama.

I hate it, it bothers the hell out of me, and it's a useless expenditure of energy.

Some things, you can't change, and people need to stop going crazy over it.

If you can't say "I don't care" and mean it sometimes, you end up depressed.

 

[Batousaii]

imported post

AWDstylez= Drama.... I seen it so many times now...

...and again, he has derailed a thread....

Nothing productive EVER comes from his rantings, all he really does is rabble his ranting, insult people who dare to disagree, and create arguments.

Stylez" -lol- sad case indeed.

but again, be careful... he "knows the Internet" (or so he told me..)

-- so, my final conclusion ..... AWDstylez= the "Lawn Mower Man" ... unfortunately being integrated with the Internet never really got him over his retardation ......

AWDstylez, shouldn't you be mowing my lawn or something??.... i'll give you a cookie ok.

 

[deepdiver]

imported post

Wow, did I miss the excitement. :?

Looking through Idontownone's short posting history, it amounted to walking up to a group of 12,000 people hanging out who share a common interest and screaming, "You all are a bunch of stupid yahoos" and flipping the bird and then acting surprised when they respond with "Whatever, go away."

I'm not inclined to believe the story in the OP as to his intentions as there are certain things that read like bull squeeze. Whatever.

 

[AWDstylez]

imported post

Batousaii wrote:

AWDstylez= Drama.... I seen it so many times now...

...and again, he has derailed a thread....

Nothing productive EVER comes from his rantings, all he really does is rabble his ranting, insult people who dare to disagree, and create arguments.

Stylez" -lol- sad case indeed.

but again, be careful... he "knows the Internet" (or so he told me..)

-- so, my final conclusion ..... AWDstylez= the "Lawn Mower Man" ... unfortunately being integrated with the Internet never really got him over his retardation ......

AWDstylez, shouldn't you be mowing my lawn or something??.... i'll give you a cookie ok.

You draw a lot of conclusions for someone that hasn't even been here two months. :quirky

 

[wrightme]

imported post

AWDstylez wrote:

Batousaii wrote:

AWDstylez, shouldn't you be mowing my lawn or something??.... i'll give you a cookie ok.

You draw a lot of conclusions for someone that hasn't even been here two months. :quirky

Really? Where was he? And, how do you know where he was?

Since when has there been a "limit" on "be a member in OCDO" for some arbitrary timeframe before being able to think logically? In your case, you seem to be a bit "shy" of it IMHO.

 

[AWDstylez]

imported post

wrightme wrote:

AWDstylez wrote:

Batousaii wrote:

AWDstylez, shouldn't you be mowing my lawn or something??.... i'll give you a cookie ok.

You draw a lot of conclusions for someone that hasn't even been here two months. :quirky

Really? Where was he? And, how do you know where he was?

Since when has there been a "limit" on "be a member in OCDO" for some arbitrary timeframe before being able to think logically? In your case, you seem to be a bit "shy" of it IMHO.

As usual, your retarded ass jumps to conclusions based on a world of faulty ASSumptions.

I said he HASN'T BEEN HERE LONG ENOUGH. Which means HE HASN'T SEEN ENOUGH HISTORY OF THE FORUM. Thinking logically has NOTHING to do with it. Having been here when intelligent discussion actually happened, DOES.

 

[wrightme]

imported post

AWDstylez wrote:

wrightme wrote:

AWDstylez wrote:

Batousaii wrote:

AWDstylez, shouldn't you be mowing my lawn or something??.... i'll give you a cookie ok.

You draw a lot of conclusions for someone that hasn't even been here two months. :quirky

Really? Where was he? And, how do you know where he was?

Since when has there been a "limit" on "be a member in OCDO" for some arbitrary timeframe before being able to think logically? In your case, you seem to be a bit "shy" of it IMHO.

As usual, your retarded ass jumps to conclusions based on a world of faulty ASSumptions.

I said he HASN'T BEEN HERE LONG ENOUGH. Which means HE HASN'T SEEN ENOUGH HISTORY OF THE FORUM. Thinking logically has NOTHING to do with it. Having been here when intelligent discussion actually happened, DOES.

Wrong. it is all about thinking logically. It is not about how long anyone has been on this forum. You are judged based upon your actions. As indicated in your response, you are simply a rude, obnoxious, childish person. It matters not what you may have done before; you are judged on the person you are presenting to others now. Present a different face, receive a different response.


There is nothing faulty about the assumption. It is logical. You act, people judge. Act different, people will look at you differently.

 

[RJ]

imported post

Wow, my serial number of 67 PM7 for an ignor button.

Wasn't hard to figure out its uses here.

 

[shad0wfax]

imported post

AWDstylez wrote:

As usual, your retarded ass jumps to conclusions based on a world of faulty ASSumptions.

I said he HASN'T BEEN HERE LONG ENOUGH. Which means HE HASN'T SEEN ENOUGH HISTORY OF THE FORUM. Thinking logically has NOTHING to do with it. Having been here when intelligent discussion actually happened, DOES.

Ah, so this must be that intelligent discussion we've all been looking for.

 

[AWDstylez]

imported post

wrightme wrote:

AWDstylez wrote:

wrightme wrote:

AWDstylez wrote:

Batousaii wrote:

AWDstylez, shouldn't you be mowing my lawn or something??.... i'll give you a cookie ok.

You draw a lot of conclusions for someone that hasn't even been here two months. :quirky

Really? Where was he? And, how do you know where he was?

Since when has there been a "limit" on "be a member in OCDO" for some arbitrary timeframe before being able to think logically? In your case, you seem to be a bit "shy" of it IMHO.

As usual, your retarded ass jumps to conclusions based on a world of faulty ASSumptions.

I said he HASN'T BEEN HERE LONG ENOUGH. Which means HE HASN'T SEEN ENOUGH HISTORY OF THE FORUM. Thinking logically has NOTHING to do with it. Having been here when intelligent discussion actually happened, DOES.

Wrong. it is all about thinking logically. It is not about how long anyone has been on this forum. You are judged based upon your actions.

Ah, but see, you're making more faulty ASSumptions.

Judging someone based a FEW actions is NOT the same as judging someone based on ALL their actions.

ASSumptions are bad for you. You try too hard to redefine the world and the meaning of statements to suit you.

 

[wrightme]

imported post

AWDstylez wrote:

wrightme wrote:

AWDstylez wrote:

wrightme wrote:

AWDstylez wrote:

Batousaii wrote:

AWDstylez, shouldn't you be mowing my lawn or something??.... i'll give you a cookie ok.

You draw a lot of conclusions for someone that hasn't even been here two months. :quirky

Really? Where was he? And, how do you know where he was?

Since when has there been a "limit" on "be a member in OCDO" for some arbitrary timeframe before being able to think logically? In your case, you seem to be a bit "shy" of it IMHO.

As usual, your retarded ass jumps to conclusions based on a world of faulty ASSumptions.

I said he HASN'T BEEN HERE LONG ENOUGH. Which means HE HASN'T SEEN ENOUGH HISTORY OF THE FORUM. Thinking logically has NOTHING to do with it. Having been here when intelligent discussion actually happened, DOES.

Wrong. it is all about thinking logically. It is not about how long anyone has been on this forum. You are judged based upon your actions.

Ah, but see, you're making more faulty ASSumptions.

Judging someone based a FEW actions is NOT the same as judging someone based on ALL their actions.

ASSumptions are bad for you. You try too hard to redefine the world and the meaning of statements to suit you.

Maybe, but it is still a valid assumption to make, no matter how much you attempt to call it invalid.
I am not judging you "based a FEW actions," I am judging you based upon your current predominant pattern of actions.

As example, if a model employee suddenly shows up for work late one day, his past actions (showing up on time) are likely to be used to judge him. If that same employee repeats the pattern of showing up late, he is now judged on his current pattern. His past has been superseded by his present.

When someone posts a rude comment on a web forum about one person, he is likely to be judged based upon his past posting style. If he continually posts rude comments about people who only show disagreement with his position, he is judged based upon his current stylez, and the past has been superseded by his present.

This is a reasonable assumption. You are responding rudely. This is your current style. You are judged based upon it.

 

[Alexcabbie]

imported post

Oh hell. Somebody gives Styles his own thread to bat down and trade insults on but can baby suck on the pacifier? No, baby trow dat pacifier on floor see who pick it up. I see this every time I eat at the Italian joint downstairs and I don't see why I need to see more of it here. Unwatch topic.

 

[XD40coyote]

imported post

Idontownone is possibly from the suntalk foums, which is the Baltimore Sun newspaper's forums. Lately there is thisgoofball troll-typethere who thinks all "gunnuts" will wildly shoot at everything if MD went shall-issue, and has even said things about how its the "knutknut", not the gun, he is most worried about, as in " how do I know who is the potential knutknut and who isn't with a ccw permit?". There were just too many things of similarity between idontownone and thisdingaling at suntalk. I even made mention at suntalk to this guy to keep his trolling out of opencarry.org, and he did not respond to me. Antis always try to look the other way and be mute when they are outed. BTW Sonora Rebel was also right in the middle of the poo-pile at suntalk.



Mr Kangaroo, why do these other people hate furries so much? LOL

 

[ixtow]

imported post

Anyone setting out to write a thesis should know that testing methodologies involving deliberate provocation and antagonizing, are not valid testing methodologies....

It's just one lie after another....

 

[david.ross]

imported post

XD40coyote wrote:

Mr Kangaroo, why do these other people hate furries so much? LOL

I haven't seen any furry hate in this thread. I made the comment people were causing drama like as if they were all furries.

I wish the people in this thread would stop creating drama...

 

[NoHadji]

imported post

Hef wrote:

AWDstylez wrote:

How is he a fraud because he's looking to get to know pro-gun people for a master's thesis?

Here's an idea, find out what his thesis is and maybe try to present this community in the best light possible. Or everyone can just keep acting like idiots, as they are now, and this community can continue to be the laughing stock of the rest of the country.

And our fearless leader is AWD. Seriously dude you are pathetic.