Cremator75
Regular Member
This is a good reminder to always have at least two carry pieces in case something like this happens.
This is a good reminder to always have at least two carry pieces in case something like this happens.
There are many good reasons to carry a BUG, but I'm not going to ask how having such would have benefited him in this specific case.
Further, I will look very unkindly on it if anyone suggests that the use of lethal, self-defense action would have been appropriate to this regard.
While the victim has most likely seen where he might have handled things a bit differently, I seriously doubt the above would have been a consideration.
I believe he was suggesting NOT a BUG on person, but rather another tool in a separate location where one could still have a firearm available as a tool of self-defense UNTIL such time as he was able to REPOSSESS the one seized.
I believe he was suggesting NOT a BUG on person, but rather another tool in a separate location where one could still have a firearm available as a tool of self-defense UNTIL such time as he was able to REPOSSESS the one seized.
Exactly what I thought too
I believe he was suggesting NOT a BUG on person, but rather another tool in a separate location where one could still have a firearm available as a tool of self-defense UNTIL such time as he was able to REPOSSESS the one seized.
This is a good reminder to always have at least two carry pieces in case something like this happens.
NO.Is there a law that requires a firearm to be registered with the police in OR?
I believe that the gun is registered now.
Promptly sell that gun to a reputable gun dealer and buy a new one...
I don't see how it matters. The PERSON is now "registered" as a gun owner. They won't care which guns he has when they "come."
Promptly sell that gun to a reputable gun dealer and buy a new one.
Consider that gun radioactive.