Interceptor_Knight said:
...a ban on carry of a firearm in all city buildings with the only exception being the direct entrance to and use of a restroom at a park.
Well, isn't that nice of them?
I'll be able to protect myself when I'm in a vulnerable position, but not if I wanted to pay taxes or borrow a book (if I lived there).
The only other prohibition is on the concealed carry of weapons which are not firearms which must be openly carried if carried in a city owned building.
They can't do that. It's not in the law.
See the right-hand column of pg. 17 of the PDF of the law (in my sig):
943.13 (1m) (c) 4 Enters or remains in any part of a building that is owned, occupied, or controlled by the state or any local governmental unit, excluding any building or portion of a building under s. 175.60 (16) (a), if the state or local governmental unit has notified the actor not to enter or remain in the building while carrying a firearm or with that type of firearm.
(does not apply to parking garages or a person who leases part of the building)
Says nothing about that they can require any certain type of carry,
or that they are allowed to ban anything except firearms.
Interceptor_Knight said:
don't you dare think about carrying them around children. They may catch black rifle disease or something.
LOL! I'll have to remember that one.