• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

for those who thought the gov wasn't going to attempt to completely disarm us...

motoxmann

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
760
Location
Middletown, CT
this is a bill that was proposed in CT.

link to the thread on it in the CT section: http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/s...cdl-an-act-concerning-restrictions-on-gun-use

http://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/TOB/S/2013SB-00122-R00-SB.htm

Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY


Introduced by:


SEN. MEYER, 12th Dist.


AN ACT CONCERNING RESTRICTIONS ON GUN USE.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:

That the general statutes be amended to establish a class C felony offense, except for certain military and law enforcement personnel and certain gun clubs, for (1) any person or organization to purchase, sell, donate, transport, possess or use any gun except one made to fire a single round, (2) any person to fire a gun containing more than a single round, (3) any person or organization to receive from another state, territory or country a gun made to fire multiple rounds, or (4) any person or organization to purchase, sell, donate or possess a magazine or clip capable of holding more than one round.

Statement of Purpose:

To reduce the use of guns for criminal purposes.

I can't even say how many times I've read it now, and I still can't believe my eyes. this is beyond anything I ever imagined
 

KYKevin

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 29, 2010
Messages
323
Location
Owensboro, Kentucky, USA
I don't think this is meant to pass. They will probably introduce several like this to make the AWB bill that finstein wants to pass look more attractive. Giving it a better chance to pass.
 

pfries

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2012
Messages
182
Location
East Tennessee
this is a bill that was proposed in CT.

link to the thread on it in the CT section: http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/s...cdl-an-act-concerning-restrictions-on-gun-use



I can't even say how many times I've read it now, and I still can't believe my eyes. this is beyond anything I ever imagined

Great so now they are pushing for disposable guns....:banghead: criminals will love that.

Seriously though it upsets me to even see something like this introduced, anywhere.
 

motoxmann

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Messages
760
Location
Middletown, CT
I think that a compromise will be found somewhere between 1 and 30 rounds......10 rounds sounds like a good number. :uhoh:

sounds like a great number; for someone who wishes to die for a cause :uhoh:

(notice I used the word "wishes", NOT "willing")
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,169
Location
earth's crust
Those in Hartford do know that the atomic bomb is technology that is 60+ years old right? They going to pass a law saying no one can build a functioning one? They are not hard to make-I saw a kid make one on youtube. And what they going to do when one goes off, give the guy a ticket?

Also, that's one round, right? Seems to conform to the proposed law .. as long as its shot out of a barrel (no problem-o).


;););)

God, they are idiots ...

Actually, I would treat this as a serious piece of legislation. Clearly the democratic leadership supports it or it would not have been received.

We should welcome this bill and support it ! Just to have the courts strike it down.

The more democrats who vote/sign this bill the better !
 
Top