Well, this is basic stuff - usually in life, involvement will get more of a result than inaction. There are some exceptions, but they don't apply here. Arguing against that, especially in our current situation with the nation starting to pick up momentum again, would be pretty abstract and contrarian. This is not 2014 anymore; look around and recalibrate with current reality. Beyond that, appointing pro-2A judges will generally get a better result than anti judges. And we know who gets these judges appointed and who gets them approved, and what we need to do to keep that happening and better our situation for years to come. Sorry, but that's how it is. If you want to try and convince yourself that you'll get more of what you want by doing less to get there...I won't waste time arguing with that kind of position. BTW, that kind of realistic thinking did NOT lead us to this point, it started long before we were born and consisted of apathy/inaction on one side (ready to repeat that?) and radical activism and infiltration on the other. If you want to do even more, be a teacher, a journalist, a judge, a policeman, an ATF agent, a politician, etc. Inaction is not the way to succeed. It's the way to repeat history.