capitol police try baiting oc'rs

[GlockRDH]

ok..i resized that one toooooo small....i think this is better.

 

[Jason in WI]

Awesome! :shocker:

 

[protias]

Here ya go....cant see my sidearm though...
View attachment 7347

You should have asked if you could have switched sides.

 

[Outdoorsman1]

Here ya go....cant see my sidearm though...

View attachment 7347

Yep, cool....

With that buldge in his pants, Good Old J.B. must have been carrying concealed with his new permit # ONE, or maybe he was just happy to see you.....

Outdoorsman1

 

[GlockRDH]

I shouldve had him point at the gun with a look of terror on his face...

 

[Outdoorsman1]

I need to make a retraction. Capitol Police DID NOT attempt to bait us. DOA policy is to allow Open Carry, (although not recommended.) OC in the Capital on Nov. 1, would have been a violation of 941.235, because we did not have licenses yet, they had no intention of doing anything about it. That was demonstrated today when GlockRDH and I open carried in the Capitol on Monday and they had no interest in checking our CWL's. No such request was made or insinuated.

A lady walked up to a Capitol Officer and claimed that our handguns had to be concealed. He responded and she challenged him and he then said, "Lady, if it was illegal, I would have arrested them already." And she walked away.


The long gun matter was a totally seperate and unrelated issue and DOA has prohibited that, making such action a trespass violation of $1,000 state forfieture.

We got a picture of J.B. Van Hollen with GlockRDH OC'ng in the Capitol.

Snip...

I need to make a retraction.

GOOD ON YOU.... Takes an MAN to admitt he was mistaken....you have my repect.

In my original post in this tread I mentioned that I was also told (face to face) that it was ok to OC in the Capitol, and that I got the very distinct impression that the guy (CLEO) that told be actually believed what he was saying.

Outdoorsman1

 

[3fgburner]

Virginia Law also requires you give up certain rights to get the CHL. You can be asked to submit to testing at any time, for one thing. (alcohol and stuff).

Nope. 18.2-308 has absolutely nothing, zip, nada about substance testing, implied consent, or anything else.

 

[HandyHamlet]

Here ya go....cant see my sidearm though...

Well no ****. I don't believe it. Someone pinch me.
You can see the sidearm blocking your right hand a bit in the larger image.






Van Hollen is such a tease. All these mixed signals! What is a country girl to think?

 

[davegran]

....Van Hollen is such a tease. All these mixed signals! What is a country girl to think?

I would advise you to keep your legs crossed, just like Momma' said.... :uhoh:

 

[MKEgal]

GlockRDH and I open carried in the Capitol on Monday and they had no interest in checking our CWL's. No such request was made or insinuated.

A lady walked up to a Capitol Officer and claimed that our handguns had to be concealed. He responded and she challenged him and he then said, "Lady, if it was illegal, I would have arrested them already."

LOL!!

I should've had him point at the gun with a look of terror on his face...

Or pull his coat aside to show his pistol.
Man, Jay, how do you do stuff like that?
I mean, he was just wandering around & agreed to pose for a picture?

When my WI permit eventually shows up, we'll have to do lunch again, then go back to the Capitol w/ cameras after the unwashed hippie protest singers are done for the day.
Or, heck, meander through the middle of them, armed. [evil grin]