• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Arrested in Courthouse

Marco

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
3,905
Location
Greene County
imported post

why do all these threads become us vs.the cops:banghead:

the Original Post isn't about that:p
 

LEO 229

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
7,606
Location
USA
imported post

doctork wrote:
This is the first message I have posted on this site. I don't understand your message about going around and around.
You may not have said anything prior about it but many other members have. :D

PM sent to answer your post.
 

LEO 229

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 21, 2007
Messages
7,606
Location
USA
imported post

Agent19 wrote:
why do all these threads become us vs.the cops:banghead:

the Original Post isn't about that:p


In one way or another.... each thread has some type of police contact.

Man + Gun + In Public = Police Contact

Police = Problems

Not all police contacts are bad but..... all the bad contacts are being posted here.

Not a bad thing to inform others since it let's others know what "can" happen. But it does cause resentment and all cops get lumped into one pot.

This, in turn, creates the US vs Them.
 

smccomas

Regular Member
Joined
May 21, 2007
Messages
235
Location
Richmond, Virginia, USA
imported post

"Not all police contacts are bad but..... all the bad contacts are being posted here" LEO229

Thats not entirely true. Someone posted on another state there experience, where they went into convenient store there was an officer present and the only contact was a nod a holding of a door that was it. According to the OP he was OCing

I call that a good contact
 

xd.40

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
399
Location
Manassas, Virginia, USA
imported post

I think what LEO 229 is referring to the contacts where cops are bashed. Even in the positive posts that I have read, some posters (whether joking or not) still bash the police. I think it's a lose-lose situation until all we hear are positive encounters (Don't hold your breath though... we might be seeing people like this -> :cuss:) :lol:
 

smccomas

Regular Member
Joined
May 21, 2007
Messages
235
Location
Richmond, Virginia, USA
imported post

xd.40 wrote:
I think what LEO 229 is referring to the contacts where cops are bashed. Even in the positive posts that I have read, some posters (whether joking or not) still bash the police. I think it's a lose-lose situation until all we hear are positive encounters (Don't hold your breath though... we might be seeing people like this -> :cuss:) :lol:
You have a point, I think he also takes it personal much like when someone writes ex marine or civilian versus citizen it jumps out at me.
 

longwatch

Founder's Club Member - Moderator
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
4,327
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

OK lets not get into OCers vs. the Police either, its not germane to this discussion.
 

smccomas

Regular Member
Joined
May 21, 2007
Messages
235
Location
Richmond, Virginia, USA
imported post

longwatch wrote:
That was aimed at LEO 229 too, he put a pretty serious charge out there.
True, I don't always agree with him but his points are valid and most of the time I believe he is correct according to the letter of the law. (IMO) If it deviates from that I page down.

On topic of this thread the OP mademistake that MAY have broke the letter of the law, I don't know I amnot a lawyer and I didn't stay at a holiday inn.

If it was me I would fight it in court.
 

longwatch

Founder's Club Member - Moderator
Joined
May 14, 2006
Messages
4,327
Location
Virginia, USA
imported post

I think you would lose that fight its not like its a vaguely worded code. Now if you wanted to fight the constitutionality of the law, you might have something.
 

sjhipple

Regular Member
Joined
May 31, 2007
Messages
1,491
Location
Concord, New Hampshire, USA
imported post

longwatch wrote:
I think you would lose that fight its not like its a vaguely worded code. Now if you wanted to fight the constitutionality of the law, you might have something.

There are always plea bargains...but if you take a plea, I would reserve the right to appeal the constitutionality of the law, as longwatch said. Also, the DA, may be willing to give you some sort of break...given that you have no record and what not. Don't give up hope.

I think one good challenge would be that it's cruel and unusual punishment. The Model Penal Code states that "strict liability" offenses (i.e., those crimes that involve no guilty mind...crimes that don't require to have been aware of what you were doing or negligent/reckless in the carrying out of the act) should ONLY be "violations," not crimes and should only be punishable with small fines (e.g., you park in a spot that was illegal to park in, but had no way in heaven or earth of knowing...you still have to pay the fine...but that's a violation with a small fine...not a misdemeanor).
 

PT111

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2007
Messages
2,243
Location
, South Carolina, USA
imported post

longwatch wrote:
I think you would lose that fight its not like its a vaguely worded code. Now if you wanted to fight the constitutionality of the law, you might have something.

I have no idea about the whether the OP is guilty or not being unfamiliar with the laws involved but this is a great point. Too many people choose to ignore laws simply because they do not agree with them for whatever reason. When a law is placed on the books the only ways to change them is either to challenge them in court or work to get the law changed. To simply ignore them without the will to fully challege them is not going to accomplish anything other than making your life miserable. We can complain on this board or others all we want to but that isn't going to do anything but allow you to vent your frustrations. Bashing LEO isn't going to do any good because they are carrying out the law which is their job, not to interpret the law or act a judge and jury as most on here seem to want them to do.

If you feel a law is unjust then do something about it other than complain.
 

HankT

State Researcher
Joined
Feb 20, 2007
Messages
6,215
Location
Invisible Mode
imported post

PT111 wrote:
longwatch wrote:
I think you would lose that fight its not like its a vaguely worded code. Now if you wanted to fight the constitutionality of the law, you might have something.

I have no idea about the whether the OP is guilty or not being unfamiliar with the laws involved but this is a great point. Too many people choose to ignore laws simply because they do not agree with them for whatever reason. When a law is placed on the books the only ways to change them is either to challenge them in court or work to get the law changed. To simply ignore them without the will to fully challege them is not going to accomplish anything other than making your life miserable. We can complain on this board or others all we want to but that isn't going to do anything but allow you to vent your frustrations. Bashing LEO isn't going to do any good because they are carrying out the law which is their job, not to interpret the law or act a judge and jury as most on here seem to want them to do.

If you feel a law is unjust then do something about it other than complain.
^^^^^^
Candidate for Best Post of theWeek.



The rapidity with which advocates go from a strict construction of laws (when their enemies break them) to a flexible construction of laws (when their friends are in a jam) is utterly amazing. It's just being politically correct, of course (don't we all just hate political correctness?). But it convinces no reasonable person. It changes nothing. It often goes beyond just grousing and complaining--all the way to whining.
 

peter nap

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
13,551
Location
Valhalla
imported post

Too many people choose to ignore laws simply because they do not agree with them for whatever reason. When a law is placed on the books the only ways to change them is either to challenge them in court or work to get the law changed. To simply ignore them without the will to fully challege them is not going to accomplish anything other than making your life miserable. We can complain on this board or others all we want to but that isn't going to do anything but allow you to

OH....I don't know about that:p
It depends on the law or more specifically, the penalty.

Felonies, I am very careful about. Yes I commit them sometimes and so does every one else. The things that have been reclassified as a felony is mind boggling. Did you know wearing a dust mask while mowing your lawn during hay fever season without an affidavit from your Doctor, is a class 6 felony
http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+18.2-422

A class 1 misdemeanor ....I am cautious about.

Anything below, I ignore when I don't like it but am prepared to pay a fine if caught. I once had a bet with my accountant as to who could go the longest with a dead inspection sticker without getting caught. We went a year before he got a ticket in South Boston of all places.:shock:
 

ilbob

Campaign Veteran
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
778
Location
, Illinois, USA
imported post

Agent19 wrote:
why do all these threads become us vs.the cops:banghead:

the Original Post isn't about that:p

Most of us have legitimate concerns about the extent of government power. Guess who is the sharp stick in enforcing government edicts?

The guys we should really be mad at are the legislatures. But they have managed to insulate themselves pretty well from any serious public scrutiny about the effects of the laws they bring into existence.

We should also be mad at the various executive branch politicans who fail miserably in their duty to protect us from police misconduct and overreaching.
 

roscoe13

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2007
Messages
1,134
Location
Catlett, Virginia, USA
imported post

Agent19 wrote:
or upon any private property in this Commonwealth without first having obtained from the owner or tenant thereof consent to do so in writing.
So, if I'm the owner, do I have to give myself permission in writing?!?!?
 
Top