• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Ammunition serialization bill (HB 3359)

dekrev

New member
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6
Location
, ,
imported post

Ive been doing a lot of research on this subject and have made no decision. I am only adding two cents of "why not"? to the boards full of negatives.

I am a huge gun rights advocate and I had to ask myself one question:

What would I be willing to sacrifice to prevent crime associated with firearms...

If properly done.

Laser etching a barcode to the case is not an expensive process. It can be done on the sheet of brass prior to case manufacture or during the stamping process for caliber/mfg/batch... also if removed would render the case unsafe or even unuseable.

The only change in the manufacturing process would be the additional equipment required to laser etch the material - this additional cost if sponsored by the government would not require any significant increase in the cost of ammunition. Since the barcode is associated with the case it would also have no significant impact on people who reload...

lets say it costs $0.03 per round:

box of 20 + $0.60

box of 50 + $1.50

case of 1000 + $30

Would I pay an extra $30/1000 knowing that by barcoding my ammunition and holding me accountable for it will keep it out of the hands of criminals? sure

Black market unmarked ammo would become so costly - the average parking lot criminal looking to grab a wallet or two would NOT have the ability to purchase ammunition - good for all of us.

The only criminals that would be able to afford black market ammunition would use it quite sparingly - also good for the average citizen.

I would even go so far as to require a backround check for purchasing ammunition. Every gun owner I know receives a backround check for a firearms purchase... its a phone call and a few minutes... Would I be willing to wait a few minutes in exchange for the knowledge that the average criminal would not be able to purchase ammunition? sure

Now - being that a firearm without ammunition is useless - there should be no restrictions on firearms at all... assault rifle or otherwise.

Every law or otherwise relating to firearm bans/ownership should be alleviated/repealed.

If all goes well - you can purchase any firearm you wish... pay a negligable increase in cost of ammunition... and feel safe in the knowledge that ifthe average criminal wants to come after the average citizen with a firearm, chances are it doesnt have ammunition in it.

I hold myself accountable already being a responsible gun owner. I read laws and become involved in my local/state government when things look squirrelly. I live in PA and right now the mayor of Philly is nutty. (pun intended). Here is a typical person grasping at anything to curtail gun violence with no rational thought.

What gets me is why the average person immediately associates firearms with gun violence? Media? Media? Media?

I open carry and I carry concealed - I feel there is a time and a place for everything: whats more - any gun owner feels the same. What works to our advantage is we are all going through it together but without any kind of clear / concise leadership. The NRA is ridiculous - always covering the same tired ground...

What we need is a group - FirearmUnited Constitutional Kingdom Uncontested- for example:

This group has to be proactive / thinking outside the box. As firearm owners we are part of the problem not part of the solution. We are always going on about our constitutional rights but we offer no solutions.

We, as gun owners, areintelligent - politically savvy - patient and all around law abiding citizens of this great country.

However is this all we can up with? "please dont take our guns"

I think we can do better than that: Band together and beat gun crime together. We need our own militia... our own "Human Security" . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_security

Actually become involved in preventing gun violence. Teach our kids responsible gun ownership. Receive tactical training.

Im going on and on and I realized - we do these things already. Now what can we do? Serialize ammunition? Why not? It isnt going to have any impact on my ability to purchase and own firearms or ammunition... but I believe it would have an impact on the average criminal who has to buy 15 rounds of 9mm for $8000.

These are just random thoughts - Offensive to some - devils advocate to others... They're just thoughts: discuss
D
 

tricityguy

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
189
Location
, ,
imported post

Would I pay an extra $30/1000 knowing that by barcoding my ammunition and holding me accountable for it will keep it out of the hands of criminals? sure
You miss the point - it won't keep it out of the hands of criminals. Criminals don't follow the laws. They'll just import unmarked ammo from another state or country, or load their own, or buy with a fake ID. It's a minor hurdle for them and a law they have no trouble breaking - I mean, if you're going to commit murder, what do you care about all of the lessor laws you violate in the process? They already own illegal guns, what makes you think they won't be able to get illegal ammo?

It will, however, create all kinds of problems for the rest of us. I don't know about you but I share my ammo with friends and family and don't pick up all of my spent shell casings, which a criminal could collect and reload. If ammo registered to me falls into the wrong hands, or a criminal steals my identity to buy ammo, guess whose door the police break down at 3am? I don't want guns pointed at my kids' heads. So now I not only have to pay more for ammo, I have to be crazy about tracking each and every bullet, pickup and destroy each and every casing, refuse to share with others, ... and for what? A law that will do nothing to stop criminals?

No thanks.
 

sirpuma

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2007
Messages
905
Location
Deer Park, Washington, USA
imported post

dekrev wrote:
Ive been doing a lot of research on this subject and have made no decision. I am only adding two cents of "why not"? to the boards full of negatives.

I am a huge gun rights advocate and I had to ask myself one question:

What would I be willing to sacrifice to prevent crime associated with firearms...

If properly done.
As the late great Ben Franklin said "The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either."

How far will people continue to be willing to let our legislators step on, grind up and steal our God given rights.

The Second Amendment is clear enough. "... shall NOT be infringed." The definition of Infringe from http://aolsvc.merriam-webster.aol.com/dictionary/infringe

infringe
One entry found.

Main Entry: in·fringe
Pronunciation: in-ˈfrinj
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): in·fringed; in·fring·ing
Etymology: Medieval Latin infringere, from Latin, to break, crush, from in- + frangere to break — more at break
Date: 1513

transitive verb:
1: to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another <infringe a patent>
2 (obsolete) : defeat , frustrate
intransitive verb: encroach —used with on or upon<infringe on our rights>
synonyms: see trespass

In my view, any law that restricts, prohibits, regulates or in some way interferes with my inalienable rights as listed in the BoR and Constitution is an infringement.
 

joeroket

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
3,339
Location
Everett, Washington, USA
imported post

tricityguy wrote:
Would I pay an extra $30/1000 knowing that by barcoding my ammunition and holding me accountable for it will keep it out of the hands of criminals? sure
You miss the point - it won't keep it out of the hands of criminals. Criminals don't follow the laws. They'll just import unmarked ammo from another state or country, or load their own, or buy with a fake ID. It's a minor hurdle for them and a law they have no trouble breaking - I mean, if you're going to commit murder, what do you care about all of the lessor laws you violate in the process? They already own illegal guns, what makes you think they won't be able to get illegal ammo?

It will, however, create all kinds of problems for the rest of us. I don't know about you but I share my ammo with friends and family and don't pick up all of my spent shell casings, which a criminal could collect and reload. If ammo registered to me falls into the wrong hands, or a criminal steals my identity to buy ammo, guess whose door the police break down at 3am? I don't want guns pointed at my kids' heads. So now I not only have to pay more for ammo, I have to be crazy about tracking each and every bullet, pickup and destroy each and every casing, refuse to share with others, ... and for what? A law that will do nothing to stop criminals?

No thanks.
Precisely my thoughts as well.
 

amlevin

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Messages
5,937
Location
North of Seattle, Washington, USA
imported post

I make my own ammunition and I'll be damned if I am going to put a serial number on it. Also, if they were to serial number brass, there is a good chance I may someday be shooting ammo with "your" serial number.

Please explain just how serial numbers will keep ammo from those who don't give a crap about laws?????? Aren't they the real problem?

How about some laws that get serious about removing THEM from society?

Maybe a few Sheriff Joe type jails (Tents, Razor Wire, Bunk Beds, Bologna Sandwichs, Pink Boxer Shorts, etc) around the country might help.
 

Dave_pro2a

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
2,132
Location
, ,
imported post

dekrev wrote:
Would I pay an extra $30/1000 knowing that by barcoding my ammunition and holding me accountable for it will keep it out of the hands of criminals? sure

Black market unmarked ammo would become so costly - the average parking lot criminal looking to grab a wallet or two would NOT have the ability to purchase ammunition - good for all of us.

You seem to have 2 brain cells, and they aren't talking to each other.

Good luck.
 

lukeshort

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
100
Location
, Oregon, USA
imported post

This is really getting pathetic. When legislatures come up with this stuff, they have way to much time on their hands. Legislators at all levels of government need to take a long vacation.

Politicians everywhere are really going to far with this stuff. There is no public safety or reason other than "CONTROL" that can explain this type of legislation to a rational American. Are the majority ofcitizens of this country blind or just ignorant to the fact we are no longer in control of those that, in their words, lead us? We as a people do not need to elect leaders, butrepresentatives. Who the hell are they representing with this bill?


Abill like this will simply, frustrate the legal possession offirearms. In my opinionit sounds like that is what it is all about anyway.
 

sv_libertarian

State Researcher
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
3,201
Location
Olympia, WA, ,
imported post

Jeez this thread is like what, a gazillion years old and the bill died in committee, never even made it to the floor for a vote.

Necropost.jpg
 

ChuckUFarley

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
256
Location
Renton, Washington, USA
imported post

joeroket wrote:
un-freakin-believable. I can't believe they introduce such an isanely stupid and pathetic bill.
Believe it, if they cant take away your guns they will make damn sure it will become so expensive to keep them that you will just "choose" to stop purchasing ammo or firearms.
 

Bear 45/70

Regular Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
3,256
Location
Union, Washington, USA
imported post

ChuckUFarley wrote:
joeroket wrote:
un-freakin-believable. I can't believe they introduce such an isanely stupid and pathetic bill.
Believe it, if they cant take away your guns they will make damn sure it will become so expensive to keep them that you will just "choose" to stop purchasing ammo or firearms.
I already build my own ammo. It's much cheaper and takes up my timeand I have enough brass and primers to last until the morons are dead and gone because of their own stupidity. Oh, and I make my own bullets too.:cool:
 

amlevin

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2007
Messages
5,937
Location
North of Seattle, Washington, USA
imported post

Bear 45/70 wrote:
I already build my own ammo. It's much cheaper and takes up my timeand I have enough brass and primers to last until the morons are dead and gone because of their own stupidity. Oh, and I make my own bullets too.:cool:

It's nice to hear from another person that is also "self sufficient". Unlike most of the freeloaders out there that continue to elect liberals in order to get the government to provide for them.

It's long past time for someone to "pull the chain" in Olympia and flush the big toilet that our government has become.
 

Bear 45/70

Regular Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
3,256
Location
Union, Washington, USA
imported post

amlevin wrote:
Bear 45/70 wrote:
I already build my own ammo. It's much cheaper and takes up my timeand I have enough brass and primers to last until the morons are dead and gone because of their own stupidity. Oh, and I make my own bullets too.:cool:

It's nice to hear from another person that is also "self sufficient". Unlike most of the freeloaders out there that continue to elect liberals in order to get the government to provide for them.

It's long past time for someone to "pull the chain" in Olympia and flush the big toilet that our government has become.
It's not just Oly, it's every seat of any government in this country up to and especially including Washington DC.
 

lukeshort

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
100
Location
, Oregon, USA
imported post

sv_libertarian wrote:
Jeez this thread is like what, a gazillion years old and the bill died in committee, never even made it to the floor for a vote.


Yes it is an old post, but Oct 7th, somebody made a bad stab at rationalizing this type of gov. intrusion.

I will almost bet the idea is not dead, as the bill died. There are still states and politicians contemplating this type of socialism. Be that as it may. This issue will not die or go away, because an Internet forum stops discussing it.

Geeeeeez...not in a gazillion years, butuntil they have all your rights, and call them privileges.
 

Trigger Dr

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2007
Messages
2,760
Location
Wa, ,
imported post

Dekrev,

I certainly hope you made that post in jest, because if you were even the least bit serious, you are just another part of the problem we face.
 

lukeshort

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
100
Location
, Oregon, USA
imported post

Gun ownership is not all about hunting and self preservation only. I'm yelling into the wind when I say that, I'm sure. But the 2nd amend, is not there to preserve your hobbies and life alone. People that believe this, are distend to vote themselves, and everyone else into servitude along with them.

Why not whittle away at ammunition, for public safety? Well if you ever uphold and defend the Constitution against "foreign or domestic" enemies. I guess they will no right were to find you.

Gun owners are already targets for power hungry @$$holes. Everyone with a cc permit, background checked for purchase, members of clubs,are marked already. So why do they need to further burden us with ridiculous laws that accomplish nothing in as far as law enforcement?They don't enforce the weapons laws now against criminals as it is. And law abiding citizens are treated like criminals, because some air head don't like the site of a gun. And some LEO'shave there heart and minds in the wrong place.So I would like someone else to try and convince me that we need to have coded ammunition so law enforcement can track down those responsible for a crime.

Most of these politicians don't know the difference between "semi & full automatic" let alone what self defence really means. And I should trust their wisdom on gun control and violent crime legislation?
 
Top