• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Why Might You Need a Gun on Virginia Tech's Ultra-safe, Gun-free Campus?

va_tazdad

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2009
Messages
1,162
Location
Richmond, Virginia, USA
Nothing new about this.

This is the second time this has happened. I now regard the Dispatch as unreliable.

See this instead:

Ross Ashley offered no signs of future danger as a college freshman, former roommate says


Ashley was the Non-Cho. No red flags whatsoever. Thus, there was no way the government could have prevented Ashley from obtaining, then using, the gun to commit murder.

This has actually become a case example illustrating the futility of government background checks and prior restraint generally.

I have called them the Richmond Times Disgrace for years. Honesty, accuracy and truthfulness are NOT the norm for them. For a while, I thought Dangerous Dan Rather was running the yellow rag.
 

Repeater

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
2,498
Location
Richmond, Virginia, USA
I have called them the Richmond Times Disgrace for years. Honesty, accuracy and truthfulness are NOT the norm for them. For a while, I thought Dangerous Dan Rather was running the yellow rag.

The Richmond News-Leader was pretty good. Then Media-General bought the paper and closed it. It's called progress.
 

Repeater

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
2,498
Location
Richmond, Virginia, USA
Gun Owners = "Lesser Individuals"

This is from a professor:

Easy guns, hard deaths
Eight people dead in the last two weeks - six in North Carolina, two in Virginia - and all might be alive today if four of them had not had guns and murderous, suicidal impulses.

In two of these cases, in Moore County and in Blacksburg, Va., victims were police officers, one serving a warrant, the other making a traffic stop. Another victim, in Wendell, was a man trying to get out of a relationship with another man. The fourth was the wife of a service member just back from Afghanistan. In all the cases, the shooter killed himself. Investigations become cursory and futile with no one to interview, and even the news stories get buried.

...

I never have been rabidly anti-gun, and I even competed on my college rifle team and had a father and brothers who were avid hunters. It is hard not to conclude, though, that easily obtainable (especially in Virginia) pistols hold a lot more potential for injury than any public good, no matter what the advocates of gun ownership contend.

I believe the presence of guns in society is more likely to be harmful than beneficial. I cannot take seriously the people who believe that carrying concealed weapons will make all of us safer.

To think that a gun-toting citizen is going to intervene in a life-or-death crisis to save the day is simply wrong. If the two police officers tragically killed, men who carried firearms and had recurrent training on their use, could not defend themselves, how is a lesser individual going to protect someone else?

More from David Codrea.

The Professor:

Bob Kochersberger teaches journalism in the English department at N.C. State University. He can be reached at bobkochs@gmail.com.
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
This is from a professor:

Easy guns, hard deaths

Being misguided and ill informed is not restricted to academia, although there seems to be a plethora of it there. Having an illogical opinion creates neither truth nor fact.

If swords had been outlawed, the Roman legions would not have slaughtered so many people. :banghead:

If England had outlawed knives sooner, Jack the Ripper's victims would have lived out their full lives. :banghead:

If fertilizer and diesel fuel had been illegal, the Oklahoma tragedy would never have occurred. :banghead:

If it had been illegal to fly airplanes into buildings, 9-11 would never have happened. :banghead:

My dear professor, do you not know the difference between a defensive use of a tool and the manifestly human act of aggression? The problem with your version of Utopia is that you would remove all objects that might harm people and that, sir, is an absolute impossibility!! Along the way, we would become as lambs waiting for the slaughter.

OTOH, we [strike]would[/strike] will allow people to make their own choice as to whether to defend/protect themselves in the face of such threats or cringe in terror. Maybe there will be adequate time (not likely) to call 911 and wait for the arrival of what?..........men with GUNS. Strange that.

I respect your right to have an opinion on the matter but find the quality of your presentation to be well below standard - hence do not be surprised when you see an F on your report card.
 

PistolPackingMomma

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2011
Messages
1,884
Location
SC
In my experience it's always a double standard with the anti's.

"How dare you carry that gun! You're just endangering innocent people!"

Then the SHTF...

"How dare you, only carrying to protect yourself! I think you are obligated to save me!"
 
Top