Prometheus
Regular Member
imported post
For those of you who by now have had time to read the ruling...
Exactly what are you so happy about?
Ruling that the 2A is an Individual Right is indeed long over due, but the rest of the decision is utter insanity.
To say they are talking out of the sides of their mouth is putting it mildly.
Lets rehash what the USSC said:
Pros-
1- Individual Right to RKBA.
2- Struck down trigger locks, BUT only because the wording was too vague, could also list as a con
Cons-
Government can-
1- Register firearms
2- License gun owners
3- Regulate and/or ban certain types of weapons and abilities:
3a- hi capacity magazines
3b- assault weapons
3c- full auto
3d- other features such as barrel length and action types (such as semi auto)
4- regulate the carry of firearms outside of the house
5- regulate mere possession (unloaded) outside of home
6- only said the 2A was for hunting and self defense ONLY, contradictory the wording of the 2A
and the biggest yet, COMPLETELY IGNORING THE WORDING OF THE 2A "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
Look closer and you'll find more, but these are the most glaring.
So please, explain to me how the USSC didn't just slap gun owners in the face paying nothing but mere lip service to the Constitution and BOR?
For those who've forgotten registration leads to confiscation, ALWAYS!
For those of you who by now have had time to read the ruling...
Exactly what are you so happy about?
Ruling that the 2A is an Individual Right is indeed long over due, but the rest of the decision is utter insanity.
To say they are talking out of the sides of their mouth is putting it mildly.
Lets rehash what the USSC said:
Pros-
1- Individual Right to RKBA.
2- Struck down trigger locks, BUT only because the wording was too vague, could also list as a con
Cons-
Government can-
1- Register firearms
2- License gun owners
3- Regulate and/or ban certain types of weapons and abilities:
3a- hi capacity magazines
3b- assault weapons
3c- full auto
3d- other features such as barrel length and action types (such as semi auto)
4- regulate the carry of firearms outside of the house
5- regulate mere possession (unloaded) outside of home
6- only said the 2A was for hunting and self defense ONLY, contradictory the wording of the 2A
and the biggest yet, COMPLETELY IGNORING THE WORDING OF THE 2A "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
Look closer and you'll find more, but these are the most glaring.
So please, explain to me how the USSC didn't just slap gun owners in the face paying nothing but mere lip service to the Constitution and BOR?
For those who've forgotten registration leads to confiscation, ALWAYS!