• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Video: Charges Against Doctor with AR in Airport were False

ccwinstructor

Centurion
Joined
Jul 11, 2008
Messages
915
Location
Yuma, Arizona, USA
I found copies of the video, and a statement by an unnamed witness that there never was a "muzzle sweep". it appears that the police interviewed the two women five seconds after the Doctor unslung the rifle. I never saw the muzzle move more than 20 degrees off of vertical.

The videos, which include prominent TV anchor Mark Curtis saying that it would be reasonable for any Arizonan to "blow away" anyone who came into a Starbucks with a rifle over his shoulder, are at the article.

http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2014/08/video-doctor-with-ar15-at-phoenix.html
 

Javelina

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
125
Location
East Valley
Mark Curtis

I can now say I dislike Mark Curtis, the guy is an idiot thinking that just because someone walks around with a gun they deserve to get "blown away".
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,336
Location
Valhalla
I found copies of the video, and a statement by an unnamed witness that there never was a "muzzle sweep". it appears that the police interviewed the two women five seconds after the Doctor unslung the rifle. I never saw the muzzle move more than 20 degrees off of vertical.

The videos, which include prominent TV anchor Mark Curtis saying that it would be reasonable for any Arizonan to "blow away" anyone who came into a Starbucks with a rifle over his shoulder, are at the article.

http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2014/08/video-doctor-with-ar15-at-phoenix.html
Dr. Steinmetz was involved in strong, political speech with his protest, protected by both the first and second amendments. The fact that he was arrested, charged, was suspended from his job, his name smeared across the nation and internationally, with what appear to be false accusations, seems calculated to engender a chilling effect on the exercise of first and second amendment rights.
http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2014/08/video-doctor-with-ar15-at-phoenix.html

Can you say "Ka-ching"?

My crystal ball sees a substantial windfall in the doctor's future.
 
Last edited:

Kopis

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
674
Location
Nashville, TN
Typically, anyone/company involved would be a named defendant including the lady who reported him. She could be on the hook personally but starbucks and the airport authority have the deep pockets.
 

Javelina

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
125
Location
East Valley
I couldn't see Starbucks since it seems like they have nothing really to do with it (i.e. calling the police or claiming to be a "victim") however I could possibly see something with the police or Sky Harbor, only time will tell.
 

Rusty Young Man

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2013
Messages
1,548
Location
Árida Zona
I couldn't see Starbucks since it seems like they have nothing really to do with it (i.e. calling the police or claiming to be a "victim") however I could possibly see something with the police or Sky Harbor, only time will tell.
And the two females, if they are the ones on the left side of the video. This is about teaching so-called "public servants" to obey the law and respect the Rights of the individual (as well as not throwing their weight around to enforce their opinions), teaching people that not to bear false witness (especially when it causes an innocent the deprivation of his Freedom), not about the money.
The money just seems to be the only effective way to have people remember for the next time.
 
Top