Treaty Signed

[22Luke36]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/24/kerry-to-sign-un-arms-treaty-despite-senators-opposition/

 

[Raggs]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/24/kerry-to-sign-un-arms-treaty-despite-senators-opposition/

not really surprising is it?

 

[Griz]

Ratification will be a whole seperate process. Not sure it will any time soon.

 

[Black_water]

Even if ratified, it is meaningless.

 

[Samopal]

And? Unless this treaty was drastically changed from what it's been all these years, it doesn't affect national gun laws or the trade of civilian firearms and ammunition. Last I checked the treaty was an agreement to not ship weapons to governments guilty of human rights violations, ie. stopping things like FN selling Gaddafi a bunch of F2000s and grenade launchers. People are really getting their panties in a bunch and doubling-up on the tinfoil hats with this thing.

 

[Citizen]

I didn't see in the linked article where it said the treay was signed.

 

[Logan 5]

I'm not worried about it. Some people talk as if the UN is any kind of a threat to America. They aren't.

 

[22Luke36]

I disagree. We don't run the world anymore, they have no respect for us, and we can't fight a war against the people we owe money to.