• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

South Jordan insanity

SecondAmendmentStudents

Regular Member
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
75
Location
, ,
imported post

I spoke with the Chief of SJPD yesterday about this. There will be a couple of public "education and information meeting" from 6:30to 7:30:

7/8/2008 @ South Jordan Community Center (10778 S. Redwood Rd)

7/22/2008@ Gale Center of History and Culture (10300 S. Beckstead Lane)

In my opinion, thishasa feel of "come let the ruling class tell you poor dumb shmucks why you should go along with what we say," but I suppose I should be glad that they didn't just vote it throughduring the first City Council meeting and that we'll be given a chance to attend the "education and information meeting."

It also irritates me that the first time we'll be able to see the proposed ordinance will be at that meeting. It doesn't give one much time to compose well-reasoned arguments or thoroughly analyze the proposal. But then againsince it's not a "public comment" period (see preceding paragraph), maybe they don't much care about our well-reasoned arguments and thorough analysis.

While on the phone with the chief I asked him, "Do you know of any law that would be violated by Open Carry of a firearm?" I was trying to explore if he intended to pursue the 'disturbing the peace' route, and wanted to let him know that there might be lawfully-armed citizens carrying their weapons openly around South Jordan (in the hopes that they won't over-react). After a significant pause, he said, "No" and I left it at that.

I spoke with a City Council member earlier and got the impression that paintball guns will be exempt from this new draft of the ordinance. I imagine it will focus mostly on AirSoft, and maybe BB or pellet guns. 'Course I won't know until Tuesday.

Anyways, like I've said before, I think this reinforces the societal prejudice against armed citizens and I plan to oppose it and would be happy to have any and all support that anyone can offer.
 

41 Magnum

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
291
Location
uTAH-life member: NRA, GOA, CCRKBA, ,
imported post

Paintball guns exempt, you say? Sounds like some council members have friends/relatives/children involved in said activity.



If they want to be asses about it, someone ought to educate them on what a frozen paintball out of a high end gun can do. BB guns are dangerous, but paintball isn't? Nice double standard.:banghead:



Just so you know, I do fall squarely on the side of the whole thing being ridiculous.
 

SecondAmendmentStudents

Regular Member
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
75
Location
, ,
imported post

I got a look at the law during the first meeting. It turns out that my council member was wrong (or deceptive). Paintball guns are still banned under the new law. As has been said, it's been modified so that there's a private property exception now, but they seem intent on passing something along these lines.
 
Top