• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Peruta v. San Diego - Motions to Intervene Denied

California Right To Carry

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2013
Messages
462
Location
United States
Time to stick the procedural fork in Peruta may be close at hand.

Peruta v. San Diego Appeal 10-56971
Update November 20, 2014 (12:22 AM) - The motion to stay my case by Attorney General Harris strongly suggests that she believes that the only route left for her to attack the Peruta decision is via the Richards v. Prieto appeal or for the Court of Appeals to call for an en banc hearing on its own. Seven days post denial of the motions to intervene have now passed. The mandate in Peruta can be issued at any time. Attorney General Harris has not filed any motions regarding the mandate or the denial of her motion to intervene and her motion for a rehearing. There are now 14 days remaining for a non-panel judge to make what is known as a 5.4(b) notice request for an en banc hearing. Within the next 14 days any non-panel judge can “stop the clock” for a lone 14 day extension of time. If that doesn’t happen then it may be time to stick the procedural fork in Peruta. This is the simplified version. For a more detailed en banc procedure guide, click here. For an en banc procedure flowchart, click here.
 
Top