AWDstylez
Banned
imported post
wrightme wrote:
wrightme wrote:
Again, semantics. The point remains the same. You derailed the argument, in a poor attempt to prove it wrong, because you failed at drawing obvious conclusions that even a blind person could see. The end result remains the same, Faux is not news and is not authoritative, quoteable, or credible for use in a debate. Nothing has changed despite your inability to understand the original point.I was presenting no strawmen. I took your statements verbatim, and showed them to be false. The part I colored in blue above is where you finally make a valid statement based upon the news story you quoted.