Gundude
Regular Member
My first priority is to be able to carry a loaded weapon for self defense.
First, I would like to see Calif go shall issue. Then, I can then carry everywhere except sensitive areas. 626.9 will be moot. Business's that don't want firearms inside won't know.
Granted, it's a permission slip, but the Sheriff will be reduced to the administrative duties of issuing CCW's. I suspect they will tire of this quickly.
After we get shall issue, I want LOC with 626.9 and the federal GFSZ gone. Getting rid of 12031 only but leaving 626.9 and the federal GFSZ intact won't help much. We will still be playing the "lock it up" game. This will be a while in coming, but I feel it can be acheived. Mainly because it is racial in nature, and the only difference between LOC and having a CCW is, someone can see the gun.
I would like to see us with something like Arizona has, but I think we will end up with something more like Nevada.
First, I would like to see Calif go shall issue. Then, I can then carry everywhere except sensitive areas. 626.9 will be moot. Business's that don't want firearms inside won't know.
Granted, it's a permission slip, but the Sheriff will be reduced to the administrative duties of issuing CCW's. I suspect they will tire of this quickly.
After we get shall issue, I want LOC with 626.9 and the federal GFSZ gone. Getting rid of 12031 only but leaving 626.9 and the federal GFSZ intact won't help much. We will still be playing the "lock it up" game. This will be a while in coming, but I feel it can be acheived. Mainly because it is racial in nature, and the only difference between LOC and having a CCW is, someone can see the gun.
I would like to see us with something like Arizona has, but I think we will end up with something more like Nevada.