What Im doing isnt hypocritical, although I get where you are coming from, and all things being equal I would wholeheartedly agree.
There are two levels upon which I see the rights themselves as being unequal. First, the RKBA should not be so weak that it can be granted or denied by a person working at the local store, probably making a shade above the minimum wage. It's disgraceful An second, since denying a persons private property rights in a place open to the public, doesn't hurt anyone, but denying someones RKBA could, then the choice is clear, you err on the side of safety.
Private property home/car and private property open to the publc are completely different animals, and the law needs to be brought in line with that fact.
THe .gov should not be allowed to hand over control our rights as they do in 425o and 234d. They also should not be protecting the private property rights in how it relates to guns, if they are going to turn around and enforce a ban on smoking for example in those same places of business.