Warren Drouin
Regular Member
Warren--
I voted for the final legislation to maintain the privacy of concealed weapon permits in the same manner other records of citizens are kept private. The Oregon University System recently passed a rule that will reduce the ability of people to carry arms on campuses, and I support that rule.
I would have voted yes on SB 1574. It is the right of citizens to own guns, and it is the right of institutions to restrict the presence of guns on their property or in their buildings, such is the case in court buildings and other institutions (as well as on airplanes). There is nothing in the Constitution that says otherwise. Your right to keep and bear arms is protected, but your right to take your gun onto someone else's property when they have expressed their opposition to your doing so is not protected by the Constitution.
Rep. Buckley
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems to me that my Representative did not read Article 1 Section 27 "Right to bear arms; military subordinate to civil power. The people shall have the right to bear arms for the defence [sic] of themselves, and the State, but the Military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power". I guess he did not read that ONE word "bear". It sad to see that our Representative are not taking their oath serious to our constitution, but for their own agenda. He need to understand that it is a "public building" that is Publicly OWN, not personally own (personal property).
Rep. Peter Buckley (D)
District: 005
900 Court Street NE
Suite H-286
Salem, OR 97301
Phone: (503) 986-1405
Fax: (503) 986-1130
WebSite: http://www.leg.state.or.us/buckley
E-Mail: rep.peterbuckley@state.or.us
I voted for the final legislation to maintain the privacy of concealed weapon permits in the same manner other records of citizens are kept private. The Oregon University System recently passed a rule that will reduce the ability of people to carry arms on campuses, and I support that rule.
I would have voted yes on SB 1574. It is the right of citizens to own guns, and it is the right of institutions to restrict the presence of guns on their property or in their buildings, such is the case in court buildings and other institutions (as well as on airplanes). There is nothing in the Constitution that says otherwise. Your right to keep and bear arms is protected, but your right to take your gun onto someone else's property when they have expressed their opposition to your doing so is not protected by the Constitution.
Rep. Buckley
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It seems to me that my Representative did not read Article 1 Section 27 "Right to bear arms; military subordinate to civil power. The people shall have the right to bear arms for the defence [sic] of themselves, and the State, but the Military shall be kept in strict subordination to the civil power". I guess he did not read that ONE word "bear". It sad to see that our Representative are not taking their oath serious to our constitution, but for their own agenda. He need to understand that it is a "public building" that is Publicly OWN, not personally own (personal property).
Rep. Peter Buckley (D)
District: 005
900 Court Street NE
Suite H-286
Salem, OR 97301
Phone: (503) 986-1405
Fax: (503) 986-1130
WebSite: http://www.leg.state.or.us/buckley
E-Mail: rep.peterbuckley@state.or.us