• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Happy New Years ! Now we can take your guns away easily.

Firearms Iinstuctor

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
3,345
Location
northern wis
A nasty law that well see a lot of abuse, have a discussion at the dinner table with a anti freedom relative they report that they felt threaten. Bye Bye guns.

One can replace relative with girl friend, wife or anybody else that remotely related to you.
 
Last edited:

DeSchaine

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2013
Messages
537
Location
Kalamazoo, MI
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/29/california-gun-violence-restraining-order-law-goin/

“The law gives us a vehicle to cause the person to surrender their weapons, to have a time out, if you will,” Los Angeles Police Department Assistant Chief Michael Moore told a local NPR affiliate. “It allows further examination of the person’s mental state. It’s a short duration and it allows for due process,” he said. “It’s an opportunity for mental health professionals to provide an analysis of a person’s mental state.”

Beyond the fact that the Asst. Chief has the most appropriate name, he's lying through his teeth. Due process out there is to take the guns, lock them up in evidence and then loose them or send them to be destroyed even though the owners are vindicated.

Torrance Police illegally destroy guns

Roberts v. Matsuda PDF

As usual, the CA chicken littles are screwing over the common law abiding citizen. All it does is allow people with perceived grievances to rip away someones rights. I foresee a HUGE spate of perjury in CA courts, none of which will be prosecuted.
 

WalkingWolf

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2011
Messages
11,912
Location
North Carolina
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/29/california-gun-violence-restraining-order-law-goin/



Beyond the fact that the Asst. Chief has the most appropriate name, he's lying through his teeth. Due process out there is to take the guns, lock them up in evidence and then loose them or send them to be destroyed even though the owners are vindicated.

Torrance Police illegally destroy guns

Roberts v. Matsuda PDF

As usual, the CA chicken littles are screwing over the common law abiding citizen. All it does is allow people with perceived grievances to rip away someones rights. I foresee a HUGE spate of perjury in CA courts, none of which will be prosecuted.

So your saying nut cases can in CA call sane gun owners nut cases? The land of the fruits, and nuts, is truly the land of the nuts.
 

davidmcbeth

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2012
Messages
16,169
Location
earth's crust
Agree!!! my guns are not all in One place...

They are All Over the house!

:D

darth-vader-youre-doing-it-wrong.jpg
 

rightwinglibertarian

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
827
Location
Seattle WA
Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Nothing to see here. Only smell the verbal diarrhea coming from the mouths of politicians and the media.
 

OC for ME

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2010
Messages
12,453
Location
White Oak Plantation
To my knowledge California has not closed their borders with other states. Though, going to/through Oregon would be a bad first choice.
 
Top