• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Greetings, new to OC

Daylen

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
2,223
Location
America
Levitity doesn't help much in this situation. Common courtesy might help if you are truly attempting to assist me.

Not all laws PROHIBIT.

A couple of examples:


Laws regarding marriage PERMIT men and women to get married if they meet the requirements in said laws.

Licensing and registration laws PERMIT folks to operate motorized vehicles if the vehicle has been properly registered and licensed, and if the operator has an operator's PERMIT on his or her person.



Marriage laws are simply specific contract law, not in the same class as most other laws.

licensing and registration laws for vehicles are EXACTLY like the licensing law for concealed carry, it allows behavior that has been otherwise prohibited. Openly carrying a weapon has never been prohibited and is in fact protected from prohibition and regulation: "The right of every citizen to keep and bear arms in defense of his home, person, or property, or in aid of the civil power when thereto legally summoned, shall not be called in question, but the Legislature may regulate or forbid carrying concealed weapons."

Again if laws were permissive instead of prohibitive then please show me where breathing, walking, eating, urinating, and all other acts are permitted. Do you have a permit to eat? if not you could be breaking the law when you take a bite perhaps you should find a law that says such behavior is ok.

If you really think it is a crime to openly carry a firearm then what would be the charge for doing so? it wouldn't be 97-37-1 since that is about concealed carry, it wouldn't be 45-9-101 since that doesn't prohibit open carry or anything else, it simply allows the carrying of concealed pistols.

If you think I have a negative tone to my writing perhaps it is because I am annoyed when someone posts the same wrong opinion that is ignorant of the constitutionally protected rights of Mississippians in over 10 different threads obviously without reading through the threads where the subject is best discussed and without any logic other than "master didn't say I can!" and without reading the basis of all MS laws: the constitution. I don't like trying to have the same exact discussion across 30 threads, when someone tries to have one discussion across 30 threads that is spamming and is very rude.
 

MilProGuy

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
1,210
Location
Mississippi
Daylen:

I'd wager that you are not a day over 25 years old.

Thought I'd find help from fellow Mississippians here. Guess I was wrong.

I'll leave you to your own devices.

 
Last edited:

MSRebel54

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
238
Location
Northern Mississippi, ,
Laws do not allow laws prohibit. Do you look for a law to see if it is ok to kiss a girl? ride a bike? eat breakfast? breathe? open your eyes? walk?

I don't think Daylen was trying to be funny. I think he was trying to make a point, and I agree with him 100%. That which is not specifically prohibited, is de facto legal.

Your examples of marriage and driving don't fit the mold. Driving is illegal without a license. But if the legislature had never addressed driving one way or the other, (as in open carry), then it would be legal to drive without a license or permit from the state. Why would you even ask them for one? And marriage is under contract law, not criminal law. No one's going to put you in jail for NOT getting a marriage license. And again, if it had never been addressed in law, you wouldn't need a license to do it, would you?

Oh yeah....and I've got socks older than 25.
 

Daylen

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
2,223
Location
America
Daylen:

I'd wager that you are not a day over 25 years old.

Thought I'd find help from fellow Mississippians here. Guess I was wrong.

I'll leave you to your own devices.


Does that mean your definition of Mississippians includes asking permission to do that which is not prohibited and therefore legal? If so then you are probably wrong, most on this forum are here to discuss eliminating the taboo and misconceptions about a lawful activity so that people can enjoy freedom.
 

thearmysredneck

Regular Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
44
Location
, ,
Yea were kinda backwards from Europe. That have laws that say what there people can do. So if its not clearly stated that yes by law you can do this then you ought not do it. But here in our ONCE great Republic we had inalienable rights endow by our Creator, not privileges granted by the throne from from which the "divine right of kings" occupied. And I did say ONCE because we no longer live in a republic, more or less we are now in an oligarchy, which is what a monarchy or dictatorship really is. Wow now that I said that I suppose that you point in wondering and asking where the privilege is granted actually makes complete sense. But I digress. I'm not inciting a political discussion here only pointing out the differences between the differences is law structure vs government structure and using an excerpt from one of our historic governmental documents for illustration hope that I haven't impeded any of the rules in doing so

TAR
 

MSRebel54

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
238
Location
Northern Mississippi, ,
Yea were kinda backwards from Europe. That have laws that say what there people can do. So if its not clearly stated that yes by law you can do this then you ought not do it. But here in our ONCE great Republic we had inalienable rights endow by our Creator, not privileges granted by the throne from from which the "divine right of kings" occupied. And I did say ONCE because we no longer live in a republic, more or less we are now in an oligarchy, which is what a monarchy or dictatorship really is. Wow now that I said that I suppose that you point in wondering and asking where the privilege is granted actually makes complete sense. But I digress. I'm not inciting a political discussion here only pointing out the differences between the differences is law structure vs government structure and using an excerpt from one of our historic governmental documents for illustration hope that I haven't impeded any of the rules in doing so

TAR

I'll make it brief. I'll only say that I know where you're coming from, and have felt the same way for a LONG time.
 
Top