Mr. Y
Regular Member
imported post
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,292953,00.html
I don't think this sort of blanket statement can be supported.
If my goal is to "clear the path" for a bomber and I spy 18 OC in the cafe, I'm calling the abort signal.Depending on my backup, it may be a lower number. Of course, I'm not a terrorist, or MMM...
The article does raise a couple of good points.
Mir Aimal Kasi & Muhammed/Malvoall used low tech means to accomplish their goals and to great effect.
Thoughts?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,292953,00.html
...Israel has indeed had remarkable success in stopping terrorist gun attacks. Israelis realized that the police and military simply can't be there all the time to protect people when terrorists attack. There are simply too many vulnerable targets. And even when the police or military are nearby, terrorists wait until the police and military leave the area before attacking. If attacks still go forward, those who are openly carrying a gun for protection become the first targets that the terrorists try to take out.
I don't think this sort of blanket statement can be supported.
If my goal is to "clear the path" for a bomber and I spy 18 OC in the cafe, I'm calling the abort signal.Depending on my backup, it may be a lower number. Of course, I'm not a terrorist, or MMM...
The article does raise a couple of good points.
Mir Aimal Kasi & Muhammed/Malvoall used low tech means to accomplish their goals and to great effect.
Thoughts?