• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

FL to reach 1 million carry permits in the next few weeks!!!!

RetiredOC

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
1,561
I can't help feel that there is a page worth of postings removed. This must be one of those new 'no free speech' zones we keep hearing about now.
 

j4l

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
1,835
Location
fl
I can't help feel that there is a page worth of postings removed. This must be one of those new 'no free speech' zones we keep hearing about now.

No, Schlitz, you just need to meet the min. age requirements to see the truly adult posts that you have been blocked from viewing.
:banana:
 

Rich7553

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
515
Location
SWFL
There are at least two examples of Florida case law that I'm aware of in which the court declared licensed concealed carry to be a privilege, not a right. Therefore, we have no right to carry in Florida. Rights cannot be dependent on licensing, fees, or training requirements. That is considered to be the legal equivalent of a poll tax and is unconstitutional.
 

j4l

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
1,835
Location
fl
There are at least two examples of Florida case law that I'm aware of in which the court declared licensed concealed carry to be a privilege, not a right. Therefore, we have no right to carry in Florida. Rights cannot be dependent on licensing, fees, or training requirements. That is considered to be the legal equivalent of a poll tax and is unconstitutional.

Indeed. But even the issue of license/permits, has a lot more to do with just being another mechanism for the State to collect fees of some sort, than of actually controlling anything, or denying anyone anything. It's almost all about the $$$.
And then there's the funds the State gets for fingerprint processing, licensing the folks who become "authorized" by the State to give the CCW classes, etc. It just snow-balls into more ways to collect funds, is all.

WE take it as some affront to our rights, etc. -which for us it is-but to the State? It's just more $$ to gather from yet another activity.
 

RetiredOC

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
1,561
No, Schlitz, you just need to meet the min. age requirements to see the truly adult posts that you have been blocked from viewing.
:banana:

"truly adult posts?" 1/10. best i can do.
 

j4l

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
1,835
Location
fl
"truly adult posts?" 1/10. best i can do.

motivator2948333.jpg
 

hammer6

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2008
Messages
1,461
Location
Florida
There are at least two examples of Florida case law that I'm aware of in which the court declared licensed concealed carry to be a privilege, not a right. Therefore, we have no right to carry in Florida. Rights cannot be dependent on licensing, fees, or training requirements. That is considered to be the legal equivalent of a poll tax and is unconstitutional.

and?
 

Rich7553

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
515
Location
SWFL
Indeed. But even the issue of license/permits, has a lot more to do with just being another mechanism for the State to collect fees of some sort, than of actually controlling anything, or denying anyone anything. It's almost all about the $$$.
And then there's the funds the State gets for fingerprint processing, licensing the folks who become "authorized" by the State to give the CCW classes, etc. It just snow-balls into more ways to collect funds, is all.

WE take it as some affront to our rights, etc. -which for us it is-but to the State? It's just more $$ to gather from yet another activity.

The incentive to collect funds through licensing has been significantly diminished since those funds by law must be used to support the program and cannot be transferred to the general fund.
 

rvrctyrngr

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
363
Location
SE of DiSOrDEr, ,
Indeed. But even the issue of license/permits, has a lot more to do with just being another mechanism for the State to collect fees of some sort, than of actually controlling anything, or denying anyone anything. It's almost all about the $$$.
And then there's the funds the State gets for fingerprint processing, licensing the folks who become "authorized" by the State to give the CCW classes, etc. It just snow-balls into more ways to collect funds, is all.

WE take it as some affront to our rights, etc. -which for us it is-but to the State? It's just more $$ to gather from yet another activity.

Huh? The state doesn't 'license' folks to teach CWFL classes. The state accepts the credentials of certain certified instructors. Now, K-licensed folks can teach CWFLs, and they pay fees to the state, but you don't have to have a K-license to teach a CWFL class.
 

j4l

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2011
Messages
1,835
Location
fl
Huh? The state doesn't 'license' folks to teach CWFL classes. The state accepts the credentials of certain certified instructors. Now, K-licensed folks can teach CWFLs, and they pay fees to the state, but you don't have to have a K-license to teach a CWFL class.

So you're saying that any old Joe Sixpack can just up and provide CWFL certification classes without the State's blessing?
 

rvrctyrngr

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
363
Location
SE of DiSOrDEr, ,
So you're saying that any old Joe Sixpack can just up and provide CWFL certification classes without the State's blessing?

That's not even in the ballpark of what I said.

You stated that the state gets money from licensing folks to teach CWFL classes. They do not.
 

Rich7553

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
515
Location
SWFL
So you're saying that any old Joe Sixpack can just up and provide CWFL certification classes without the State's blessing?

If Joe sixpack is a certified NRA pistol instructor or has one of the other state issued firearms instructor licenses.
 

Glock_Tactical

New member
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
1
Location
Spring Hill, FL
I went into my local Sheriff's office today to find out about weapons transport without a permit. They stated that even without a permit you can have your hand gun in your glove box fully loaded while it is securely encased.
 
Last edited:

rvrctyrngr

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Messages
363
Location
SE of DiSOrDEr, ,
I went into my local Sheriff's office today to find out about weapons transport without a permit. They stated that even without a permit you can have your hand gun in your glove box fully loaded while it is securely encased.

Mostly correct...in your glovebox IS securely encased. Nothing else needed, but using a holster is always a good idea.
 

Rich7553

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
515
Location
SWFL
I went into my local Sheriff's office today to find out about weapons transport without a permit. They stated that even without a permit you can have your hand gun in your glove box fully loaded while it is securely encased.

I'd advise you not to ask law enforcement what the law is. You were fortunate in that you got a mostly correct answer. There are thousands of laws, and law enforcement is only likely to know the ones they deal with on a regular basis. If they don't know, you will likely get the answer they perceive will cause the least problem for them and the public, which is often incorrect.

If you have any questions, email Florida Carry. There is a link on the website to contact us. We have firearms attorneys on staff who can give you the correct answer. www.floridacarry.org
 

shastadude17

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Messages
150
Location
United States
I'd advise you not to ask law enforcement what the law is. You were fortunate in that you got a mostly correct answer. There are thousands of laws, and law enforcement is only likely to know the ones they deal with on a regular basis. If they don't know, you will likely get the answer they perceive will cause the least problem for them and the public, which is often incorrect.

If you have any questions, email Florida Carry. There is a link on the website to contact us. We have firearms attorneys on staff who can give you the correct answer. www.floridacarry.org

This. I can't even begin to tell you how many myths, urban legends, and blatantly false information regarding firearms law I have heard from LEO's. After the Aurora shooting, I was speaking with an LEO I know and he in utter disbelief said to me "I just don't understand how they say he bought all his guns legally. He didn't have a hunting license or concealed handgun permit, so I don't know how he could have gotten those guns."

Most LEO's just see LE as a job. A lot of them don't keep up with case law, and a lot of the time not even statutory law. A lot of them aren't familiar with firearms aside from how to operate their duty weapon. I have a buddy who became a LEO and quit after a few months because it wasn't for him. I asked if he was going to go get his FL CWP...he said "Nah bro, my law enforcement certification is good for like another 3 years so I'm just gonna carry with that." (You can only carry as a LEO if you are actively employed as a LEO...)

Moral of the story: Don't ask cops legal questions unless it pertains to domestic violence, drugs, or traffic violations :]
 

ixtow

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2006
Messages
5,038
Location
Suwannee County, FL
This. I can't even begin to tell you how many myths, urban legends, and blatantly false information regarding firearms law I have heard from LEO's. After the Aurora shooting, I was speaking with an LEO I know and he in utter disbelief said to me "I just don't understand how they say he bought all his guns legally. He didn't have a hunting license or concealed handgun permit, so I don't know how he could have gotten those guns."

Most LEO's just see LE as a job. A lot of them don't keep up with case law, and a lot of the time not even statutory law. A lot of them aren't familiar with firearms aside from how to operate their duty weapon. I have a buddy who became a LEO and quit after a few months because it wasn't for him. I asked if he was going to go get his FL CWP...he said "Nah bro, my law enforcement certification is good for like another 3 years so I'm just gonna carry with that." (You can only carry as a LEO if you are actively employed as a LEO...)

Moral of the story: Don't ask cops legal questions unless it pertains to domestic violence, drugs, or traffic violations :]

And another +1 for it...

COMMENTS REMOVED BY ADMINISTRATOR: LEO Bashing
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top