• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Feinstein up for indictment for treason

Saxxon

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
222
Location
Northglenn, Colorado
She put up her AW ban again. She talks out of the side of her mouth about guns for "legitimate" hunting or sporting purposes. The hag does not understand nor respect the aim and purpose of the 2nd Amendment as it has to do with our ability (the militia, the whole of the people able to bear arms) from throwing off a repressive tyranny that may raise its head from our own government (as if the many abuses of Obama's administration don't already qualify in part).

In US vs Miller the SCOTUS examined and found that the right applies to arms of military utility borne by the common foto soldier - in other words exactly what Feinstein wants to ban. The idea is that we can defend against tyranny, foreign invasion, civil unrest etc. Hunting, sport shooting and self defense are all derivatives of the right, not defining the right themselves.

As an official of the US government, she took an oath of office as all others do, to "defend against all enemies foreign and domestic". She has no violated that oath. That violation is treason "aiding and abetting the enemies of the people of the United States."

Her proposed ban aids our enemies without a doubt - it aids drug cartels invading our southern border and killing residents and police while moving their product and establishing their turf. It aids rioters in the wake of natural disasters. It aids flash mobs that seek to attack and kill people based on their race or for "fun".

Obviously Accomplice General Holder won't hold her accountable for her crime.

But we can certainly redouble efforts to oust anyone who supports her.

Above all, the message needs to be carried to everyone you know: This AW ban is treason.

The guns in question are the LEAST used in crime, thus the ban has at its outset no legitimate law enforcement purpose.

Almost every mass murderer in the last several decades has been on psychotropic drugs, (Selective Seratonin Reuptake Inhibitors) like Prozac, Zoloft et al. THAT is the common causality in all these incidents, which the press won't mention because of the massive amount of advertising that the pharma companies give to support the news and control the story by pulling on economic strings.

Get the word out. Check out these links in relation to the drug issue. A prominent firearms manufacturer owner was killed days after posting info related to this in a car crash of unknown cause, so you conspiracy folks can have fun with this too.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/top-psychiatrist-meds-behind-school-massacres/

http://ssristories.com/

https://www.rxisk.org/Default.aspx

This is the real reason behind this rash of shootings. Young people with developing minds given mind altering drugs that include side effects of hostility, aggression, suicidal thoughts and thoughts of harming others. Does anyone really need much more smoke to trace that round?

Finally, just remember:

Your need for an "assault weapon" and high capacity magazines is onlly a flash mob away.
 

Saxxon

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
222
Location
Northglenn, Colorado
Well if by tongue in cheek you are talking about taking down the entire House and only 2 Senators, I'd have to ask why spare the rest. If its throw all the bums to the sharks then 535 is your number, unless you include state houses also.

But in regard to the ones violating oaths of office, it has to be seen who introduces what bills and who votes for them. Not everyone serving in elected office is a total POS, just a preponderance of them.
 
Top