Emergency shelters and no guns?

[Neplusultra]

imported post

TFred wrote:

Neplusultra wrote:

TFred wrote:

paramedic70002 wrote:

So is it necessary? I think not. How can we challenge this ambiguous law?

Probably like you challenge every ambiguous law... get arrested for breaking it and spend a boatload of money on attorneys.

Justice may be blind, but she ain't cheap.

TFred

Well, you could challenge it directly too couldn't you, without getting arrested. But it would still cost money.....

I don't know if you can sue without standing, and I don't know if you can have standing if you don't have anything personally at stake. Need a lawyer type to answer that question.

If you could, then why hasn't someone with big pockets like the NRA already challenged the GFSZ?

TFred

Maybe, IANAL. But I think I would have standing. They are restricting my freedom unlawfully. Why should I have to risk going to jail to correct this? Sounds like a great tool for a tyrant if this principle is not true..... Make death the penalty for violating any law he wants to enact and basically dare people to violate them, he has nothing to lose and you everything...