First of all Tim is an idiot... So don't hold your breath that synthesis ng he writes is close to accurate.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
First of all Tim is an idiot... So don't hold your breath that synthesis ng he writes is close to accurate.
Sent from my LG-E970 using Tapatalk 2
I've not heard that Green has been told to back off. I've only heard things to the contrary.
That quote wasn't from Green.
Does anyone have a link to the whole article?
[strike]Republicans[/strike] Republicans-In-Name-Only [strike]control[/strike] have significant numbers in both the state house and senate and hold the governorship.
This from an inside, trustable source:
Skubick was using Sen. Green’s quotes out of context and to editorialize. Senate leadership actually encouraged Mike to reintroduce comprehensive CPL reform after SB 59 was vetoed.
This from an inside, trustable source:
Skubick was using Sen. Green’s quotes out of context and to editorialize. Senate leadership actually encouraged Mike to reintroduce comprehensive CPL reform after SB 59 was vetoed.
I also have heard politicians claiming their quote was taken out of context...when it wasn't. Time will tell...
I'll believe this source over a liberal media goon that half of the people here said wasn't trustable -- even before I said a word.
Always think when I hear inside source what it means is someone who shouldn't be saying anything or doesn't have the guts to put their name to it.
I tell you what I can. Don't like it? Not my problem.
I tell you what I can. Don't like it? Not my problem.
Some people just like being malcontent and wanna be rebels, and want others to join them.
And some people are overly sensitive.
Well I wasn't referring to you, but hey if you think it was about you who am I to go against that?
Some people just like being malcontent and wanna be rebels, and want others to join them.
And some people are overly sensitive.
Nope, again wrong. I am not over sensitive, merely highly allergic to BS. This site is given information, as can be released, and you dispute it's authenticity, and then cry out that no one is giving any information. You are willing to believe some hack reporter that couldn't accurately report the weather after looking out the window over people who are involved in the process. First you are upset that they are not releasing more information, and when they do, you question it's validity.