swinokur
Activist Member
gun grabbers hate the Constitution. It interferes with their utopia of Govt. control over every aspect of your life.
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
DC files a notice of appeal
- Thread starter California Right To Carry
- Start date
gun grabbers hate the Constitution. It interferes with their utopia of Govt. control over every aspect of your life.
rightwinglibertarian
Regular Member
Of course. That's half the point. Actually thats THE point. Limit the government and maximise liberty. Just a shame the infringements have been allowed to go this far. Now it will be very difficult to get things reverted to where they should be
swinokur
Activist Member
DC has filed their brief but it's too large to upload.
sorry.
sorry.
Last edited:
swinokur
Activist Member
i don't have a link. i was sent the actual pdf. Maybe Charles will put it on his web site soon.
rightwinglibertarian
Regular Member
either upload it to Google Drive or Dropbox and share the link, or I would be glad to upload it myself as I have both
swinokur
Activist Member
pm your email and I'll send it.
rightwinglibertarian
Regular Member
done
California Right To Carry
Regular Member
Update by Charles Nichols, President of California Right To Carry – August 27, 2015 – The following documents were filed in the appeal today: Appellant Opening Brief, Joint Appendix, and Separate Statutory Addendum. Please note that these are large files and I have had reports in the past of people being unable to view them from their portable devices. The only thing I can suggest is that you download the documents to your desktop and then open then with a stand alone pdf viewer.
Also, we have the NRA and “DC Appleseed Center” following Everytown for Gun Safety in seeking to become an Amicus in the appeal.
The documents are available to download here (free) -> http://blog.californiarighttocarry.org/?page_id=2619
Also, we have the NRA and “DC Appleseed Center” following Everytown for Gun Safety in seeking to become an Amicus in the appeal.
The documents are available to download here (free) -> http://blog.californiarighttocarry.org/?page_id=2619
swinokur
Activist Member
I see it's now available but sent it to you anyway.
rightwinglibertarian
Regular Member
One more link won't hurt
If anyone actually understands this mumbo jumbo good for them. I prefer to keep it a lot simpler
Last edited:
davidmcbeth
Banned
Thanks for the links guys. ROFL with these types of cases. My mother already told me I was special. Good enough for me ? LOL
Look, we have right to OC ... its a right and unlike the viewpoint of some gov't officials is not able to be regulated.
"You have a right to do this or that ... but just in the manner that we dictate is acceptable." That's not a right then.
Am I right?
Oh my, talking about scrutiny? Where is that in our constitution -- more made up gibberish by the judicial branch that I have seen legislative branches start to eat up like candy too.
rightwinglibertarian
Regular Member
Well at least nobody made mention of the horrendous website
Best I can do as i'm a one man band, not having thousands of dollars and a professional team. But I have no issue with calling out the absurd, foolish, illegal and stupid. But unlike the mainstream media I don't butter people up with a pack of lies like MSNBC, CNN etc
swinokur
Activist Member
Oral arguments scheduled for Nov 20 at 9:30 AM.
order attached
order attached
swinokur
Activist Member
Oral arguments scheduled for this Friday. Audio will be available by 3 PM day of the orals
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/recordings/recordings.nsf/
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/recordings/recordings.nsf/
swinokur
Activist Member
After listening to the orals. I don't feel very good about this case. I think the judges agreed with DC that Judge Scullin was improperly assigned this case. I think they will remand the case back to the District Court for a rehearing. we'll see.
Anything that allows DC to continue to play games is a victory for them IMO.
sad.
Anything that allows DC to continue to play games is a victory for them IMO.
sad.
Last edited:
Cathy Lanier advocates civilians shooting terrorists with guns
Could statements like this, by the DC chief of police, Cathy Lenier, be used to help advance the 2A cause in future arguments for carry in DC?
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/11/2...s-shooters-has-approved-few-gun/?intcmp=hpbt4
Could statements like this, by the DC chief of police, Cathy Lenier, be used to help advance the 2A cause in future arguments for carry in DC?
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/11/2...s-shooters-has-approved-few-gun/?intcmp=hpbt4
swinokur
Activist Member
I don't see how unless the current case before the DC Court of Appeals gets to SCOTUS where it could be included in briefs. Other than that I don't see how, but IANAL.