• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Clarify the Title 18 Section 930 rule of Federal Facilities

StingMP9

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
101
Location
Madison Hts-Carry M&P9mm CPL/NRA mem, Michigan, US
I'm curious to the meaning of this as after a month of working next door to a Marine Recruiting station I finally noticed the Weapons prohibition sign (it is posted very low, on one but not the only common entrance to their office) that is located within a broad ground level office building in Troy. I have no reason to enter but I am also fairly certain that working next door to them doesn't mean I am prohibited by any proximity, just within their "facility" which is simply the suite they lease.

Here is a link to the federal code that prohibits firearms in federal facilities:
http://law.justia.com/codes/us/2010/title18/parti/chapter44/section930/


Then what is the relevance to the last part I am reposting and bolded here, lawful carrying and lawful purposes?? :

(a) Except as provided in subsection (d), whoever knowingly possesses or causes to be present a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a Federal facility (other than a Federal court facility), or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.
(b) Whoever, with intent that a firearm or other dangerous weapon be used in the commission of a crime, knowingly possesses or causes to be present such firearm or dangerous weapon in a Federal facility, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(c) A person who kills any person in the course of a violation of subsection (a) or (b), or in the course of an attack on a Federal facility involving the use of a firearm or other dangerous weapon, or attempts or conspires to do such an act, shall be punished as provided in sections 1111, 1112, 1113, and 1117.

(d) Subsection (a) shall not apply to—
(1) the lawful performance of official duties by an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof, who is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of any violation of law;
(2) the possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon by a Federal official or a member of the Armed Forces if such possession is authorized by law; or
(3) the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes.
 

DrTodd

Michigan Moderator
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
3,337
Location
Hudsonville , Michigan, USA
I'm curious to the meaning of this as after a month of working next door to a Marine Recruiting station I finally noticed the Weapons prohibition sign (it is posted very low, on one but not the only common entrance to their office) that is located within a broad ground level office building in Troy. I have no reason to enter but I am also fairly certain that working next door to them doesn't mean I am prohibited by any proximity, just within their "facility" which is simply the suite they lease.

Here is a link to the federal code that prohibits firearms in federal facilities:
http://law.justia.com/codes/us/2010/title18/parti/chapter44/section930/


Then what is the relevance to the last part I am reposting and bolded here, lawful carrying and lawful purposes?? :

(a) Except as provided in subsection (d), whoever knowingly possesses or causes to be present a firearm or other dangerous weapon in a Federal facility (other than a Federal court facility), or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.
(b) Whoever, with intent that a firearm or other dangerous weapon be used in the commission of a crime, knowingly possesses or causes to be present such firearm or dangerous weapon in a Federal facility, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both.
(c) A person who kills any person in the course of a violation of subsection (a) or (b), or in the course of an attack on a Federal facility involving the use of a firearm or other dangerous weapon, or attempts or conspires to do such an act, shall be punished as provided in sections 1111, 1112, 1113, and 1117.

(d) Subsection (a) shall not apply to—
(1) the lawful performance of official duties by an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, a State, or a political subdivision thereof, who is authorized by law to engage in or supervise the prevention, detection, investigation, or prosecution of any violation of law;
(2) the possession of a firearm or other dangerous weapon by a Federal official or a member of the Armed Forces if such possession is authorized by law; or
(3) the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility incident to hunting or other lawful purposes.

It has been argued that this would allow legal CC/OC. I know that an attorney on MGO also believes that it may be an exception to the prohibition BUT emphatically states that his Postmaster disagrees. The question is: "Do YOU want to be the test case?"
 

TheQ

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
3,448
Location
Lansing, Michigan
If it is a building the Federal government is renting out (IE: The IRS Has an office in the Comerica Building in Downtown Detroit) -- it only applies to the area of the building the government is renting out. If there is a recruiting station in the mall, it'd only apply to the mall store/slot that hosts the recruiting station.
 

StingMP9

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
101
Location
Madison Hts-Carry M&P9mm CPL/NRA mem, Michigan, US
It has been argued that this would allow legal CC/OC. I know that an attorney on MGO also believes that it may be an exception to the prohibition BUT emphatically states that his Postmaster disagrees. The question is: "Do YOU want to be the test case?"

No test subject here. As I stated, I have no reason to enter the facility next door.
 

StingMP9

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
101
Location
Madison Hts-Carry M&P9mm CPL/NRA mem, Michigan, US
I know... it was a Rhetorical Question for benefit of the readers. I should have made that more clear.

I now see that they don't even keep the Title 18 memo on that one entrance all the time. It is back down and it probably wasn't even up that long when I did finally see it. Maybe they are waiting on the drafted law change to 10 year penalty? LOL
 

DrTodd

Michigan Moderator
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
3,337
Location
Hudsonville , Michigan, USA
I now see that they don't even keep the Title 18 memo on that one entrance all the time. It is back down and it probably wasn't even up that long when I did finally see it. Maybe they are waiting on the drafted law change to 10 year penalty? LOL

Interesting post in that I recently noticed that they have removed the signs at both of the post offices I frequent, too. hmmm
 
Top