Carrying while dropping off/picking up kid from school (sorry, tried to search).

[Interceptor_Knight]

My point is the state contradicts itself in one section defining a "dangerous weapon" as a firearm among other things. Then splits that definition regarding the moronic GFSZ.

Still boils down to double talk b/s. We the people should demand of our elected officials that this be corrected. I am writing to my legislators.

The Statute still includes a firearm in the definition of dangerous weapons. What it does is simply address all dangerous weapons except for those dangerous weapons which are firearms as firearms are addressed in a separate Statute.
I do agree that firearms should be subject to the same exception which is given to all other dangerous weapons. 948.605 should be amended to reflect this.