• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

An act of terrorism?

boundlessdyad

New member
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
72
Location
maryland
of course, you can use that feature, censorship is a great tool ~ to not hear ppl point out that what you are saying is foolish or incorrect. do you always seek the 'yes' individual in your business dealings too?

CAN'T STAND YES PEOPLE IN BUSINESS OR PERSONAL LIFE.

for example, you posted the fox cite, then immediately engaged in a rant, (which BTW had nothing to do with the cite) by name, that these certain ppl are terrorists, including the president

WRONG, INACCURATE, LIE OR WHATEVER YOU WOULD LIKE TO CALL IT. I CALLED THESE INDIVIDUALS INCLUDING OBAMA TREASONOUS TRAITORS. I STAND BEHIND THE STATEMENT. ~ all i did was point out the actual problems with fox posting the shock and awe story about the notebook. YOUR POINT IS UNDERSTOOD HOWEVER THAT DOESN'T MEAN SOME SHOCK AND AWE ISN'T NECESSARY FROM TIME TO TIME AS WE BECOME DESENSITIZED TO THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS OF OUR GOVERNMENT.
you rebutted by asking what did i know about media relations WRONG, INACCURATE, LIE AGAIN. I SARCASTICALLY CALLED YOU A MEDIA EXPERT. I DIDN'T ASK WHAT YOU KNOW ABOUT MEDIA. GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT. ~ I responded by posted a cite explaining the symbiotic relationship between news reporting and terrorist activities. GREAT, GOOD FOR YOU.

nowhere did i insult you during this exchange, DEBATABLE BUT WE CAN MOVE ON. yet you felt the need to engage in play ground taunts towards me and personal commentary saying i should seek therapy...now pray tell who truly, who really lost any and all credibility in the exchange, certainly not I! DEPENDS ON PERSPECTIVE. A FEW MEMBERS PM'd ME AFTERWARDS WITH COMMENTS ABOUT YOU THAT WEREN'T VERY KIND. YOU MAY NOT BE AS LOOKED UP TO AROUND HERE AS YOU BELIEVE.

i mean, really, look at your last post in response to grape...you sound like an emotional school boy whining to the principal..."make him stop, make him stop picking on me!!" AGAIN DEBATABLE, I SIMPLY POINTED OUT YOUR LESS THAN HOSPITABLE BEHAVIOR ON A FORUM THAT HAS SEEN A SIGNIFICANT DROP IN ACTIVE USERS SINCE I JOINED YEARS AGO. I AM NOT SAYING THAT SNARKY "KNOW IT ALL'S" ARE THE REASON BUT ONE NEVER KNOWS.

ya, the ignore list is your easy way out and it is worn as a badge of honor for you isn't it... YOU ARE NOT ON THE IGNORE LIST. FORTUNATELY I WILL CONTINUE TO BE ABLE TO SEE THE VAST WEALTH OF KNOWLEDGE YOU HAVE TO SHARE WITH US ALL.

alternatively...you could realize you are on a private forum reviewed by outside citizens, government entities ~ foreign and domestic, and realize wearing your feelings on your shirt sleeves doesn't help and realize commentary back to you isn't personal and rebut the commentary with objective information. POINT TAKEN [emoji6]

oh wait, you can't see this...alas tis a shame...but i have faith in human nature...you'll peek. NEVER ACTUALLY BLOCKED YOU. NO NEED TO PEEK.

ipse

added: another fallacy of ignore...you can't see what ppl are post about you...good or bad!
[emoji106] POST AWAY, HAVE FUN WITH IT.
 
Last edited:
Top