ghostrider
Regular Member
imported post
Everywhere else in the country, a firearm is not RS for a Terry Stop. The USSC has already ruled that officers cannot conduct fishing expositions without RS of criminal activity.
I know that it is accepted in CA that the officers may detain someone to determine if they are legally carrying, but don't doubt that if someone were to take them to federal court on a section 1983 violation that the plaintiff would win.
The rules for search and seizure as outlined by the USSC still apply to CA regardless of what policy or law the states AG implements.
Everywhere else in the country, a firearm is not RS for a Terry Stop. The USSC has already ruled that officers cannot conduct fishing expositions without RS of criminal activity.
I know that it is accepted in CA that the officers may detain someone to determine if they are legally carrying, but don't doubt that if someone were to take them to federal court on a section 1983 violation that the plaintiff would win.
The rules for search and seizure as outlined by the USSC still apply to CA regardless of what policy or law the states AG implements.