He's in Nevada and on a Nevada page, looking for other Nevadans to help him rescue your benighted state (because you folks over there seem unable to do so from within), and you have a PROBLEM with this???
I have a problem with concealed carry as does the US Supreme Court as well as state courts which have upheld prohibitions on concealed carry going back 200 years. There are a dozen California concealed carry cases already pending before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals or are in the end stage of the district court proceedings and will soon be on appeal.
These concealed carry cases have done nothing but result in bad case law in every Federal circuit which includes the 9th Circuit Peruta decision, more so should it ever become final.
""In Nunn v. State, 1 Ga. 243, 251 (1846), the Georgia Supreme Court construed the Second Amendment as protecting the "natural right of self-defence" and therefore struck down a ban on carrying pistols openly. Its opinion perfectly captured the way in which the operative clause of the Second Amendment furthers the purpose announced in the prefatory clause, in continuity with the English right...Likewise, in State v. Chandler, 5 La. Ann. 489, 490 (1850), the Louisiana Supreme Court held that citizens had a right to carry arms openly: "This is the right guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States, and which is calculated to incite men to a manly and noble defence of themselves, if necessary, and of their country, without any tendency to
secret advantages and unmanly assassinations.""
District of Columbia v. Heller, 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008) at 2809
We already have enough cowards, criminals and unmanly men carrying concealed weapons in this state.