Right. This is the inescapable conclusion of your arguments.
You said:
Why do OCers pass the problem on, but (it is implied) CCers do not? The only answer can be that OC acts as a deterrent, [strike]wasting the opportunity[/strike] obviating the need to shoot criminals who then, in your imagination, go on to do unspeakable things to the nearest pregnant mother (and her children).
From this it follows that, in your view, CC is better because it doesn't waste perfectly good opportunities to shoot bad guys.
Furthermore, you have made it clear that you yourself CC.
Therefore, you yourself have firmly established your preference for shooting bad guys over, say, scaring them off.
Finally, since you tacitly acknowledge that OC defers confrontation, and yet you maintain the superiority of CC, it is inarguable that you knowingly and intentionally make a choice which increases the probability of confrontation.
Given your clear, unambiguous, and stated preference for shooting people (vs. not shooting them) should potential confrontation arise, and your similarly unambiguous preference for increasing the chance of confrontation in the first place, it's no stretch to say that you "want to shoot people".
From this is easily follows that you also "want to kill people", unless your plan is to shoot them in the arms and legs.
QED.