imported post
CowboyKen wrote:
CowboyKen wrote:
Hi Ken. I have studied law for many years and I do tend to think outside of the box. I must inform one and all that many "statutes" are wholly or in part unconstitutional and have simply remained on the books due to carelessness or to the unwillingness of anyone to challenge them. Legislative Counsel very often fails to vet legislation as to do so would be to annoy legislators. You may very well be perfectly correct on the .10 issue but the court here in Pahrump seems to go by no particular amount anyway. Cops will claim you are under the influence for little or virtually no measurable amount while driving. It is that old "discretion" thing again. Being convicted or not is mute after you've already spent a night or two or three in jail. It seems to me that perhaps the .08 has been addressed elsewhere in the NRS's and possibly the two references haven't been correlated.Anyway, technically you can lawfully stop for a beer or two on your way while armed and not be a law breaker unless a wild deputy feels like his "discretion" needs exercise. :celebrate I just had to try the dancing bananaWizardrex wrote:CowboyKen wrote:Also be aware that any property owner/lease holder, or their representative, may ask you to leave or to check your gun if they provide for that and you must comply. Most casinos in Vegas will not allow you to open carry on their property. Have fun!
Ken
Yes. This is true now in a defacto sort of way if not de jure. But I have spoken with informed individuals who have stated that some years ago, perhaps 20 or thirty, folks wearing sidearms were common in casinos and bars. The old Helldorado Days celebrations were known for this. Here in Pahrump folks would ride their horses to a bar for example and then go in fully armed and have a few drinks. In Nevada it is not unlawful to drink while armed but the .08 rule as with driving a car applies similarly to being armed. So, if you go to a bar and drink while armed, assuming that the bartender doesn't object, you must avoid getting up to the .08 level.
Also, there is the "public place" reference to consider. Technically, a "public place" is not a private place. If you invite the public in, you are not supposed to discriminate as if the place were your bedroom. You may keep everyone out of your home but you may not keep individuals who are behaving lawfully out of your place of public business. Imagine standing at the door of Wal-Mart and saying to all of the fat people that they may not enter. Generally, the public is unaware of this. And, the concept of a "right to bear arms" isn't fully beloved by one and all. There is much caselaw on the "public place" point.
Sir,
You are incorrect as to the limit on how much one may drink. "NRS 202.257 Possession of firearm when under influence of alcohol, controlled substance or other intoxicating substance; administration of evidentiary test; penalty; forfeiture of firearm.
1. It is unlawful for a person who:
(a) Has a concentration of alcohol of 0.10 or more in his blood or breath; or..."
http://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRs/NRS-202.html#NRS202Sec257
When they lowered the DUI limit to 0.08 in order to continue to get federal highway money they did not change the firearms law.
Also, I disagree about your view on who may be "kept out." The NRS on trespass provides for baring anyone for any, or no, reason.
Ken