• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

New York losses

solus

Regular Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
9,319
Location
here nc
1656090811175.png

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Thursday, June 23, 2022
Justice Department Statement on Supreme Court Ruling on New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Bruen
The Department of Justice today released the following statement from spokeswoman Dena Iverson following the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc., et al. v. Bruen, Superintendent of New York State Police, et al.:

We respectfully disagree with the Court’s conclusion that the Second Amendment forbids New York’s reasonable requirement that individuals seeking to carry a concealed handgun must show that they need to do so for self-defense. The Department of Justice remains committed to saving innocent lives by enforcing and defending federal firearms laws, partnering with state, local and tribal authorities and using all legally available tools to tackle the epidemic of gun violence plaguing our communities.”
 

color of law

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
5,839
Location
Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
There is a lot to unpack in this opinion. This is a 63 page decision of which about 1/2 is a historical analyst of the second amendment.
Not only is the lower court twostep process out the window, so is the a judges' opinion from his/her point of view. It also appears the "affirmative defenses" are out the window.

The talking heads on TV have no clue what was decided.
 
Top