Figure I'll say it here since the other thread was closed. I don't really care for this law. Yes it's a good idea for people to shoot more, but I don't want the government authorizing itself to further require time and expense to access a privilege which should be a right. Also, given the fact that NRA range training is inept, foolish, and utterly ineffective at teaching unskilled shooters, it will only be a thorough waste of time and money unless the state mandates real world shooting in classes, which they won't since it would in effect boot the NRA out of the process completely.
The other thing I don't like about this is the establishment of an official don't carry here sign for liquor license holders. As we have it now, cpl holders are able to legally CC and go past a privately made no guns sign at a liquor license holding establishment as long as they don't make the majority of their money on on sight consumption of alcohol. The more these signs go up, the more in style they will become as more and more business owners think its okay to put them up. It's a natural effect of gun rights being exterted, but we should lobby at all times to keep the government from amplifying the effect.
In other words, I don't really see this as anything more than an attempt to streamline and extend the states grasp on power it shouldn't have. I think I'll be writing my reps to oppose it, and I'll also ask them to try to draft a bill which is actually pro freedom.