Exactly, I mean you made my point for me, EXACTLY WHOSE rights, status, or other legal relations are affected? Are you a citizen of Mississippi State, or are you a citizen of "The State of Mississippi"?
But again, CIVIL rules of procedure DO NOT apply to criminal cases, and cannot POSSIBLY get the code declared null or void. I don't EVEN care if the word STATUTE is in there, it's not going to CHANGE the STATUTE. Maybe you win a civil case, big deal, what the hell is everyone else suppose to do? The statute has not changed.
I mean really, I'm not trying to go head to head with you, but do you not SEE that the "rules of procedure" do NOT trump the Mississippi code? You may win a case.....so what?
Well I have to give credit where it is due... it is true that as a non-resident of Ms, I MAY not have standing to file. However, I doubt it.. and this is why...
Rule 57 uses the term "any person". I haven't looked yet, but I'm gonna bet that the applicable definition here for "person" does NOT include residency... we'll see...
Now.. to address the rest of what you say...
1. There is NO such thing as being a CITIZEN of a state. You are a CITIZEN of the US and a RESIDENT of a particular state. You make this mistake because you have the same grasp of the law as the average person... abysmal. If you would simply stop trying to give useless opinion and start actually reading the law you MAY learn something.
2. Ok... you are almost CORRECT that civil rules do not apply to criminal cases. Again your opinion and NOT law. In certain instances civil rules CAN apply. However, in this case, it is irrelevant and here's why...
PASSING AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW IS NOT A FRICKIN CRIME!!!! What are you thinking here... Oh I get it... we file a complaint with the local court that the evil legislature has committed a crime by enacting an unconstitutional law... and we charge them wit WHAT statute??? Uhhh... can't find it...
[ Im sure there are people that think this is the way it should be
]
The process we are given as redress, in this case, is a lawsuit filed in CIVIL court per RULE 57 whereby a person (b)1 "may have determined ANY question of CONSTRUCTION or validity arising under the instrument, STATUTE, ORDINANCE, contract, or franchise, and obtain a DECLARATION of RIGHTS, status or other legal relations thereunder."
Now of course if you "don't EVEN care if the word STATUTE is in there"... well then Im wasting my time with a person who enjoys their ignorance, but I rebut you useless opinions with the law such that others here may benefit.
Enough of your useless opinion... find the law that backs up your claims.